Sunday, March 29, 2015

GATE: Let’s change the name

By Chuck Rairdan

Among the themes that have been abundantly clear in the ongoing debate about GATE is that the name itself invites plenty of scorn and ridicule. This is an unfortunate side-effect of a legacy that is distracting us from critical issues affecting our public education system.

The current program name is rooted in the California statute that established and regulates Gifted and Talented Education, or the GATE program. The terms “gifted” and “talented” refer to a segment of the student population that, as with other focused needs programs, require a curriculum and instructional method designed to develop their full potentials. These terms were not devised to split our children into the two camps of “special” and “not special,” but the perceptions associated with their application have been problematic.

It has also become clear from the controversy that there are significant gaps in the choices available to parents in the neighborhood schools to service the full range and diversity of academic needs present in our community. In addition to high educational standards across the board and a cadre of dedicated teachers giving our children their very best, part of what distinguishes Davis public schools are precisely the choices available to meet specific instructional needs through the magnet and other tailored programs, including GATE.

To improve the choices available to all Davis parents, the school district should consider developing a more integrated set of programs that effectively addresses the range of student needs and aptitudes across all our neighborhood schools. The current dichotomous choice between GATE and not-GATE does not achieve this.

A program name change that diffuses the labeling and stereotyping that has evolved in association with the current program title would be a good place to start in concert with developing a broader spectrum of academic choices. Such a departure would, I hope, also help get the conversation moving in a more productive direction.

At DavisExcel, a community-based group committed to academic excellence for all in Davis, a name change we’ve long considered and would like to propose is Alternative Instructional Model, or AIM. This name avoids controversial terminology and alludes to what is essentially an alternative model of teaching for a targeted segment of the student population.

In making this proposal, there is still obviously much work to be done on the substantive issues affecting our schools. For one, we must continue to improve the choices available to parents while complementing the programs that are already successful in meeting the diversity of educational needs in our community.

As a town, we are better than the rancor and rhetoric surrounding the great GATE debate. There is no shortage of intelligent, well-meaning people in Davis who are capable of engaging in a meaningful discussion about the challenges facing our schools in an open and transparent setting. Hitting the reset button with a program name change for GATE may be one of the best places to start.

— Chuck Rairdan is a Davis resident and member of DavisExcel, a group of community members who support educational excellence.



Special to The Enterprise



Where do Davis recyclables go?

By Felicia Alvarez | From Page: A1 | Gallery

UCD faculty receive lowest pay in the system

By Tanya Perez | From Page: A1

Motive for murder-suicide remains a mystery

By Lauren Keene | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Davis sewage to get new digs

By Dave Ryan | From Page: A1

Human Relations Commission hosts Chávez celebration

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A2

Davis Flower Arrangers meet Wednesday

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A6

‘Music as Medicine’ is radio show topic

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A6

Friendship the topic on radio program

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A6



These results were meaningless

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: B4

Survey not representative

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: B4

Answers on the green waste program

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: B4

A phone call could have fixed this

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: B4

Milt Prigee cartoon

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: B4

Some ‘survey’ …

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: B4

Mayor’s corner: Looking ahead to spring

By Dan Wolk | From Page: B5 | Gallery

A Little Respect for Dr. Foster

By Nicholas Kristof | From Page: B5

Universities need more funding

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: B5

Father of the bride snubbed

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A8

Which experiences count as ‘once in a lifetime’?

By Marion Franck | From Page: A8

After a month of no TV news, I’m feeling much better

By Debra DeAngelo | From Page: A8

Take a hike for your heart

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A8



Republic stun Galaxy with repeated history

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

Bad fourth quarter sinks boys lacrosse

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

Aggies’ walkoff win clinches series against Riverside

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Aggie softball splits doubleheader

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

Burns scores shootout winner to lift Sharks

By The Associated Press | From Page: B2 | Gallery

UCD women’s tennis dominates at home

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B10 | Gallery







Millennials are changing our community

By Rob White | From Page: A9

With new owner, DAC will Get Fit

By Wendy Weitzel | From Page: A9 | Gallery

Grant writing for non-profits workshop set

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A9





Comics: Sunday, March 29, 2015

By Creator | From Page: B8