Thursday, April 24, 2014

Point of Brew: Pepper-spraying the brand


From page A5 | March 01, 2012 | 2 Comments

In Time magazine this week, the Lightbox image, just inside the front cover, is a beautiful photograph taken inside St Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican; it shows Pope Benedict XVI at the papal altar under the magnificent Bernini canopy at a ceremony to elevate 22 clerics to the rank of cardinal.

In a glorious sea of red, set against the soaring spectacle of the Basilica, this is a monumental reaffirmation of the Roman Catholic and the papal brands.

The brand is the thing. One might say the brand is everything. The brand sends unmistakable messages to consumers in an instantly recognizable form.

The pope and Catholicism are the most ancient and powerful brands in Christendom. It is a credit to the power of the brand that it has survived egregious misbehavior by some priests and cover-up by some bishops and, more recently, aggressive re-assertion of the right of this all-male hierarchy to dictate on issues of women’s’ health.

Over the years, I’ve seen successful beer brands succumb to error; once the brand loses credibility the company may soon fail. Way back in 1965, the Dow Brewery in Quebec used a cobalt-based product to stabilize beer foam; some people died. The brand and brewery collapsed.

Similarly, the Schlitz Brewing Company changed the brewing formulation and methods of beer processing in aggressive ways that were not strictly ready for prime time. Beer quality suffered in the trade. The brand was compromised and the company went under.

It remains to be seen whether the recent takeover of Anheuser-Busch by Inbev, and the radical change in business practices that followed, will damage the ABI brand.

No brewer with a brand worth having, or one trying to build brand value, will do anything to jeopardize the integrity of the brand. If the brand be damaged, brewers will do almost anything to restore brand integrity. For example, Dow Brewery famously emptied into the St Lawrence River all its tanks of every drop of beer; unfortunately to no avail.

The UC Davis brand has been quietly and effectively nurtured over the years as the campus has built its intellectual reputation, expanded infrastructure and grown important programs. We have matured from a rural, safe, non-radical and non-confrontational alternative to the urban campuses at UC Berkeley and UCLA to a campus attractive to students for its own prestige, programs and intellectual prowess.

In Time magazine some months ago the Lightbox image, just inside the front cover, was The Davis Enterprise’s infamous photograph of UCD students being pepper-sprayed by a campus police officer. That, of course, did our UCD brand no good.

But I do not see the functional equivalent of dumping beer into the St Lawrence River to help restore brand integrity. That is why I am writing about this now, so long after the initial event happened, and upon which so much ink and so little light was spilled.

I am concerned that the faculty of UC Davis tacitly approved the pepper-spraying incident and therefore has further compromised the brand.

This is the only conclusion I can reach after the faculty defeated by a vote of two-to-one a mealy-mouthed, weepy-willie, ineffectual non-binding resolution of no confidence in the chancellor. One might say the piffling resolution was merely symbolic. Well, of course, it was symbolic, but symbols and principles are important here, as illustrated by dumping the beer into the St Lawrence River!

I thought the faculty would be as one with the students on this issue. The faculty preferred instead a resolution that accepted an apology and praised academic leadership that is slated to bring UCD into the top five of American research universities.

Well, the top five has been achieved: I put UCD well behind Kent State and Virginia Tech and just ahead of Penn State and Duke.

The resolution that the faculty favored puts the blame squarely on the shoulders of the police officers at the scene where, doubtless, much blame belongs. But that blame is surely shared by the chief executive who put the police at the scene in the first place — deployed them, that is (a military term) — “Cry ‘Havoc’ and let slip the dogs of war,” one might say.

Though I am deeply suspicious and even alarmed at the urgency and vigor with which officials and police these days move to suppress the First Amendment right of assembly, I do have a certain sympathy with beat police officers who inevitably find themselves between a rock and a hard place.

There is an intrinsic conflict between keeping the peace and enforcing the law. They are in uniform, armed to the teeth in riot gear and full of testosterone and authority (a hard place) and faced by the intransigence of the protesters (a rock). Back off? Are you kidding?

They are now trapped between the expectation of the chief executive who sent them to the scene (a hard place) and completing the assigned mission, that is, in this case, a mandate to clear the campus (a rock). A wise initial decision could have avoided this perfect scenario for misadventure.

I guess we never fail to miss a good opportunity: The faculty vote to reject a non-binding resolution of no confidence — a mere slap on the wrist — failed in every way to restore some luster to our UC Davis brand. No dumping all our beer into the St Lawrence River for us!

However, I guess our brand is strong enough so that, like the Roman Catholic Church and the papacy, we shall smugly survive perhaps to make the same mistakes in the future.

— Reach Michael Lewis at Comment on this column at


Discussion | 2 comments

The Davis Enterprise does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy

  • Noreen MazelisMarch 01, 2012 - 10:41 pm

    Mike Lewis should stick with beer. What he knows about the RC Church wouldn't fill a thimble. Ditto for politics.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • JeremyMarch 05, 2012 - 6:48 pm

    This was an interesting new take on a topic that has been endlessly discussed. Faculty are not responsible for branding the university though. Faculty are more interested in having a positive and effective working relationship with the chancellor. We're talking about people and relationships, not companies and products. As egregiously bad as the protest response was, most faculty believe Katehi's performance has been outstanding otherwise, and that's why they voted the way they did. I think that's a respectable opinion. If UC Davis' brand was damaged, it wasn't the faculty's fault, and it's not the faculty's responsibility to fix it. The problem and solution lie with the university administration.

    Reply | Report abusive comment


4-H members get ready for Spring Show

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Will city move forward on public power review?

By Dave Ryan | From Page: A1

Obama to Russia: More sanctions are ‘teed up’

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2, 1 Comment

2 pursuits, 2 arrests keep Woodland officers busy

By Lauren Keene | From Page: A2

Youth sports in focus on radio program

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Rummage sale will benefit preschool

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Concert benefits South Korea exchange

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Conference puts focus on Arab studies

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Davis honors ‘green’ citizens

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

Water rate assistance bill advances

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

Program explores STEM careers for girls

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5, 3 Comments

Embroiderers plan a hands-on project

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

Central Park Gardens to host Volunteer Orientation Day

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5 | Gallery

Volkssporting Club plans North Davis walks

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

Hotel/conference center info meeting set

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

MOMS Club plans open house

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A7

Cycle de Mayo benefits Center for Families

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A8

Author to read ‘The Cat Who Chose to Dream’

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A12



Things are turning sour

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: B5

The high cost of employment

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6, 1 Comment

High-five to Union Bank

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

Broken sprinklers waste water

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

Three more administrators?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

Neustadt has experience for the job

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

Here’s a plan to save big on employee costs

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A6, 3 Comments

Davis is fair, thoughtful

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

Ortiz is the right choice for Yolo

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

Tom Meyer cartoon

By Debbie Davis | From Page: A6



DHS tracksters sweep another DVC meet

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Another DVC blowout for DHS girls soccer

By Evan Ream | From Page: B1, 2 Comments | Gallery

Young reinvents his game to help Aggies improve on the diamond

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1 | Gallery

DHS boys shuffle the deck to beat Cards

By Thomas Oide | From Page: B1 | Gallery

DHS/Franklin II is a close loss for Devil softballers

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

Baseball roundup: Giants slam Rockies in the 11th

By The Associated Press | From Page: B2

UCD roundup: Aggies lose a softball game at Pacific

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B3

Jahn jumps to Sacramento Republic FC

By Evan Ream | From Page: B8





Congressional art competition open to high school students

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A11

Emerson, Da Vinci to present ‘Once Upon a Mattress’

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A11

Winters Plein Air Festival begins Friday

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A11

Bach Soloists wrap up season on April 28

By Jeff Hudson | From Page: A11







Comics: Thursday, April 24, 2014

By Creator | From Page: B6