
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Address inequalities in schools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davisenterprise.com/forum/letters/address-inequalities-at-birch-lane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/forum/letters/address-inequalities-at-birch-lane/</link>
	<description>Yolo County, California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:11:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Millet</title>
		<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/forum/letters/address-inequalities-at-birch-lane/comment-page-1/#comment-403758</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michelle Millet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davisenterprise.com/?p=313015#comment-403758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wdf1: In a  letter to the editor entitled &quot;Whose made this choice anyway&quot; the author claims that &quot;the argument over choice programs has unveiled bigotry in this town&quot;. The author questions the use of the phrase &quot;white flight&quot; and the labeling of children as &quot;problematic&quot; based solely on the their ethnicity and socially economic status. In the comment section I said that comments made by a parent and teacher at school board meeting reflected a type of bigotry. It was a PERSONAL reaction to these statements that I was expressing, and in NO WAY reflects the feelings of other Montessori Parents and certainty not it&#039;s teachers. It disheartens me that my personal reflections are being used as weapon to discredit and malign these parents, and teachers, a lot of whom were also upset by my remarks.  I hope this clarifies at least one issue, and that it helps put an end to the unfair and unjustified remarks being leveled against innocent Montessori parents and teachers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wdf1: In a  letter to the editor entitled &#8220;Whose made this choice anyway&#8221; the author claims that &#8220;the argument over choice programs has unveiled bigotry in this town&#8221;. The author questions the use of the phrase &#8220;white flight&#8221; and the labeling of children as &#8220;problematic&#8221; based solely on the their ethnicity and socially economic status. In the comment section I said that comments made by a parent and teacher at school board meeting reflected a type of bigotry. It was a PERSONAL reaction to these statements that I was expressing, and in NO WAY reflects the feelings of other Montessori Parents and certainty not it&#8217;s teachers. It disheartens me that my personal reflections are being used as weapon to discredit and malign these parents, and teachers, a lot of whom were also upset by my remarks.  I hope this clarifies at least one issue, and that it helps put an end to the unfair and unjustified remarks being leveled against innocent Montessori parents and teachers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara Diel</title>
		<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/forum/letters/address-inequalities-at-birch-lane/comment-page-1/#comment-403745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tara Diel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 04:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davisenterprise.com/?p=313015#comment-403745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To wdf1:  There was commentary made on a letter to the editor from March 21 about this issue. In her commentary, a Montessori parent called the teacher and parent who spoke &quot;bigots&quot; and claimed that this &quot;sentiment is shared by more than one Birch Lane teacher.&quot;   Need I say that that accusation was simply ridiculous? The Enterprise had the good sense to see that this comment was abusive and to remove the comment within 24 hours.  This was a shameful act by one of the few Montessori parents who have behaved very badly in response to the DJUSD provided demographic data showing inequities.  Thank you to those parents from both programs who have had calm and reasonable discussions on this issue.  I do believe that we can do better for our kids.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To wdf1:  There was commentary made on a letter to the editor from March 21 about this issue. In her commentary, a Montessori parent called the teacher and parent who spoke &#8220;bigots&#8221; and claimed that this &#8220;sentiment is shared by more than one Birch Lane teacher.&#8221;   Need I say that that accusation was simply ridiculous? The Enterprise had the good sense to see that this comment was abusive and to remove the comment within 24 hours.  This was a shameful act by one of the few Montessori parents who have behaved very badly in response to the DJUSD provided demographic data showing inequities.  Thank you to those parents from both programs who have had calm and reasonable discussions on this issue.  I do believe that we can do better for our kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wdf1</title>
		<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/forum/letters/address-inequalities-at-birch-lane/comment-page-1/#comment-403728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wdf1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davisenterprise.com/?p=313015#comment-403728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;But now he is being characterized as a troublemaker who has attacked the teachers and the program. He has been labeled as a bigot and a racist for stating that a predominantly white student population in a program is de facto segregation, that separate is not equal.&quot;

I remember watching those comments on Davis Media Access.  The public comments seemed to be politely given and received.  I think I have seen all the of the letters to the editor on the topic, and it all seemed to be civil.  When and by whom was Mr. Monticello characterized as racist, bigot, and troublemaker?  Those are serious accusations for anyone to make in this context.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But now he is being characterized as a troublemaker who has attacked the teachers and the program. He has been labeled as a bigot and a racist for stating that a predominantly white student population in a program is de facto segregation, that separate is not equal.&#8221;</p>
<p>I remember watching those comments on Davis Media Access.  The public comments seemed to be politely given and received.  I think I have seen all the of the letters to the editor on the topic, and it all seemed to be civil.  When and by whom was Mr. Monticello characterized as racist, bigot, and troublemaker?  Those are serious accusations for anyone to make in this context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Pickett</title>
		<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/forum/letters/address-inequalities-at-birch-lane/comment-page-1/#comment-403726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cindy Pickett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davisenterprise.com/?p=313015#comment-403726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Annie -

I agree that &quot;shooting the messenger&quot; is not a constructive or helpful way to begin a dialogue about imbalances between the neighborhood and special programs within the school district. However, I did listen to Mr. Monticello&#039;s comments to the School Board, and I can see how his words could have been misinterpreted. What it sounded like Mr. Monticello was saying was that the Montessori program is better *because* there are fewer Hispanics, English-language learners, and low-income students. In other words, he came across to some as saying &quot;Whiter, richer = better.&quot; After talking with neighborhood parents and learning more about the situation, I realized that this was not the message that was meant to be conveyed. And it is unfortunate that this misunderstanding derailed what I do think is a very important conversation.

As one of the few African-American parents in the Montessori program, I am very sensitive to the issue of de facto segregation. I, and other Montessori parents, have been racking our brains trying to come up with solutions to the demographic imbalances that exist. We&#039;ve discussed improving outreach efforts and ways to solve the mobility issue. We&#039;ve talked about ways to change the misperception that Montessori is an elite or exclusive program. We want action and solutions too! 

Best,
Cindy Pickett]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Annie &#8211;</p>
<p>I agree that &#8220;shooting the messenger&#8221; is not a constructive or helpful way to begin a dialogue about imbalances between the neighborhood and special programs within the school district. However, I did listen to Mr. Monticello&#8217;s comments to the School Board, and I can see how his words could have been misinterpreted. What it sounded like Mr. Monticello was saying was that the Montessori program is better *because* there are fewer Hispanics, English-language learners, and low-income students. In other words, he came across to some as saying &#8220;Whiter, richer = better.&#8221; After talking with neighborhood parents and learning more about the situation, I realized that this was not the message that was meant to be conveyed. And it is unfortunate that this misunderstanding derailed what I do think is a very important conversation.</p>
<p>As one of the few African-American parents in the Montessori program, I am very sensitive to the issue of de facto segregation. I, and other Montessori parents, have been racking our brains trying to come up with solutions to the demographic imbalances that exist. We&#8217;ve discussed improving outreach efforts and ways to solve the mobility issue. We&#8217;ve talked about ways to change the misperception that Montessori is an elite or exclusive program. We want action and solutions too! </p>
<p>Best,<br />
Cindy Pickett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Quinton</title>
		<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/forum/letters/address-inequalities-at-birch-lane/comment-page-1/#comment-403725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Quinton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davisenterprise.com/?p=313015#comment-403725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are all great questions. I&#039;m sure MPAC would gladly answer them or the school district. There seems to be one sided conversation going on in The Enterprise. I think it is best to stop and talk in person and get to the root of the issue. Our students are all part of ONE school. I don&#039;t want to see our school community ruined by this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are all great questions. I&#8217;m sure MPAC would gladly answer them or the school district. There seems to be one sided conversation going on in The Enterprise. I think it is best to stop and talk in person and get to the root of the issue. Our students are all part of ONE school. I don&#8217;t want to see our school community ruined by this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
