Thursday, July 24, 2014

The problem’s in the testing

From page A12 | May 24, 2013 |

In the Sunday forum article “Dubious legal advice drove lottery,” Carlton Larson lamented the use of a lottery to select GATE-qualified students for the limited seats available in self-contained GATE classes. Larson, a law school professor, contended the district could and should select students based solely on merit, i.e., test scores.

Larson compared admission to the GATE program to tryouts for first-chair violin in the school orchestra, or for starting quarterback for the varsity football team. His argument is premised on the notion that 1) there is a prize to be won, and 2) the best students should win that prize based on IQ tests. I think these premises are flawed.

As to the first assumption, self-contained GATE has never been promoted as a prize. It is justified by the idea that GATE-qualified students “learn differently” from other students and need to be segregated to obtain specialized instruction. I haven’t seen evidence that this truly is necessary, but that is the justification. To consider self-contained GATE classes to be a prize for those third-graders who score highest on an IQ test seems to miss the point.

But even if the program is intended to address the “special needs” of a few bright kids, it is important to note that nearly 30 percent of the district’s third-graders are GATE-qualified each year. It is difficult to imagine that so many students need specialized, segregated instruction, or that such segregation is healthy for the schools as a whole.

The second assumption, that IQ testing clearly identifies deserving students, is also questionable. The majority of this year’s GATE third-graders, 112 out of 190, are identified as being in the 99th percentile. Only 15 are found at the 97th percentile and 23 at the 96th percentile. Even fewer are found at the 95th and 94th percentiles. These numbers do not resemble a bell curve.

But most striking is the fact that only 22 of those 112 in the 99th percentile were identified in the initial round of universal testing using the OLSAT. The balance of the kids were identified in a second round of one-on-one tests administered by the school district GATE administrator or from private testing. Third-graders in Davis may be smart, but it seems doubtful that 17 percent of them are in the 99th percentile of learners, especially when the first round of OLSAT testing only showed only 3 percent scoring at this high level.

Admission to the GATE program is problematic.  But the problem is in the testing, not the lottery.

Craig Lundgren

Letters to the Editor


Discussion | 3 comments

The Davis Enterprise does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy

  • wdf1May 23, 2013 - 11:02 am

    Good article. There are other problems with the analogy of GATE testing to sports tryouts and orchestra auditions that go unacknowledged. GATE testing takes place in 3rd grade, inclusion in the program is a parental choice, and often the results of GATE testing are often presented as a measure of innate ability ("born that way"), in spite of the fact the district website suggests ways a parent can prepare or coach their child to achieve a higher score ( Successful sports tryouts and orchestra usually take place in high school, and are widely understood to be the result of hard work and preparation. The student is widely understood to have more say in the choice to participate in the group. Our culture today more readily accepts an exclusionary merit-based program in the later teen years. But it is less accepting of this concept for third-graders. Note that recreational and inclusive sports programs are very popular in the elementary grades. And school music programs don't start auditioning students for various groups until high school. Before then, everyone plays in whatever grade level appropriate group.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • GrantMay 24, 2013 - 11:05 am

    Craig, I, too, became curious about the breakdown of students' percentiles, but when I contacted the GATE coordinator, I was unable to get answers. May I ask where and how you were able to get your information? I've also heard the argument that GATE students need separation because it is impossible for them to get differentiated instruction in the regular classroom. So let's see... you have the 96 - 99% in one class, and 0 - 95% in the other. Who do you think is now not getting differentiated instruction? By their logic, we should have separate classrooms for the 90 - 95%tile, 85 - 89%, etc.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Craig LundgrenMay 24, 2013 - 11:05 pm

    You can see a PDF of the DJUSD testing data here:

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Posts

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this newspaper and receive notifications of new articles by email.

  • .


    Teens lead the way in fight against cancer

    By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A1 | Gallery

    USDA predicts record almond haul in California

    By Elizabeth Case | From Page: A1 | Gallery

    Diplomas all around for professor and sons

    By Dave Jones | From Page: A3 | Gallery

    Consumption guidelines for Cache Creek fish updated

    By Elizabeth Case | From Page: A3

    Davis Flea hosts night market Sunday

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

    Free technology help offered to seniors

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

    Contestants sought for Yolo County Fair Queen contest

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

    Parents can learn all about IEPs

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

    Museum sells market bags as fundraiser

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

    City of Davis recruits for its advisory commissions

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

    Local singer/songwriter will perform Friday on KDRT

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4 | Gallery

    Zip Book: Request it, read it, return it

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A8



    Tom Meyer cartoon

    By Debbie Davis | From Page: A6

    Act now to support middle school students

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A6

    Don’t tell me I can’t help him

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

    Water trains through Davis

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

    Water storage must be a priority

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

    The real problem isn’t conflict, it’s violent conflict management

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A6



    UCD coach has navigated a Maze of experiences

    By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1 | Gallery

    Lethargic and roster thin, Post 77 loses Area 1 opener

    By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1

    Pence outscores Phillies

    By The Associated Press | From Page: B1 | Gallery

    Quincy Amarikwa: years in the making

    By Evan Ream | From Page: B1 | Gallery

    Area sports briefs: Nelson earns All-Academic honors

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B3

    Youth roundup: Aftershock finishes second in tournament

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B3

    Majka makes winning look easy

    By The Associated Press | From Page: B10 | Gallery



    Name Droppers: Transportation fellowship goes to Aggie

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A8



    ‘South Pacific’ storyline still making waves

    By Bev Sykes | From Page: A7 | Gallery

    ‘The Miracle Worker’ auditions set for WOH

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A7







    Comics: Thursday, July 24, 2014

    By Creator | From Page: B8