Sunday, March 29, 2015
YOLO COUNTY NEWS
99 CENTS

When ‘control’ doesn’t mean control

By
From page A6 | February 14, 2013 |

Brett Lee’s commentary supporting Measure I contains a misleading example regarding how the project cost will be paid. His calculation implies that the “supply charge” portion of the consumption-based fixed rate would be around $270 per year per ratepayer. But an equitable distribution of project cost isn’t how it will be paid for, and the inequitable cost distribution is one of the troubling parts of the CBFR.

The supply charge is intended to reflect the burden placed on the infrastructure by a user. Yet the supply charge is calculated using six months of “summer” water usage, ignoring six months of lower usage. Isn’t 12 months more reflective of a user’s annual burden on the system?

Moreover, the supply charge will be based on “summer” usage even though “groundwater will still be needed” then. Why is 67 percent of a user’s water bill — the charge directed toward paying for the new system — going to be based on usage during the period when the user will receive groundwater along with (or instead of) water from the new system?

Indeed, the city will continue drawing water from its wells, even though we’re told they are expensive to drill, potentially damaging to the aquifer, and with declining water quality and quantity.

Lastly, the city must collect a fixed amount of money annually through the supply charge to pay for the infrastructure, and if users conserve water, how will the city generate the amount needed to repay the loan? The answer is in the city engineer’s rate presentation (City Council, Dec. 11, 2012). The $/ccf multiplier will be increased as follows: (projected annual revenue requirement) /(projected six-month summer period peak water use of all consumers) = $/unit of water. Thus, as water usage declines, the multiplier needed to secure the required revenue via the supply charge will increase.

The city apparently adopted the CBFR formula because it guarantees that the needed dollars will be generated regardless of consumption and so it is attractive to lenders. With the CBFR, consumers won’t have “increased control over their utility bills” because an individual consumer can’t control the “peak water use of all consumers.”

Leigh Segel
Davis

Comments

comments

Letters to the Editor

  • Recent Posts

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this newspaper and receive notifications of new articles by email.

  • .

    News

    Motive for murder-suicide remains a mystery

    By Lauren Keene | From Page: A1, 1 Comment | Gallery

     
    Davis sewage to get new digs

    By Dave Ryan | From Page: A1

    Where do Davis recyclables go?

    By Felicia Alvarez | From Page: A1 | Gallery

     
    UCD faculty receive lowest pay in the system

    By Tanya Perez | From Page: A1

    Human Relations Commission hosts Chávez celebration

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A2

     
     
    Davis Flower Arrangers meet Wednesday

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A6

    ‘Music as Medicine’ is radio show topic

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A6

     
    Friendship the topic on radio program

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A6

     
    .

    Forum

    Milt Prigee cartoon

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: B4

     
    Some ‘survey’ …

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: B4

    These results were meaningless

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: B4

     
    Survey not representative

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: B4

    Answers on the green waste program

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: B4

     
    A phone call could have fixed this

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: B4

    Universities need more funding

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: B5

     
    Mayor’s corner: Looking ahead to spring

    By Dan Wolk | From Page: B5 | Gallery

    A Little Respect for Dr. Foster

    By Nicholas Kristof | From Page: B5

     
    Father of the bride snubbed

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A8

    Which experiences count as ‘once in a lifetime’?

    By Marion Franck | From Page: A8

     
    After a month of no TV news, I’m feeling much better

    By Debra DeAngelo | From Page: A8

    Take a hike for your heart

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A8

     
    .

    Sports

    Aggie softball splits doubleheader

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

     
    Davis softballers suffer setback, remain optimistic

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

    Republic stun Galaxy with repeated history

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

     
    Bad fourth quarter sinks boys lacrosse

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

    Aggies’ walkoff win clinches series against Riverside

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1 | Gallery

     
    Burns scores shootout winner to lift Sharks

    By The Associated Press | From Page: B2 | Gallery

    UCD roundup: Aggie women’s tennis dominates at home

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B10 | Gallery

     
    .

    Features

    .

    Arts

    .

    Business

    Millennials are changing our community

    By Rob White | From Page: A9

     
    With new owner, DAC will Get Fit

    By Wendy Weitzel | From Page: A9 | Gallery

    Grant writing for non-profits workshop set

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A9

     
    .

    Obituaries

    .

    Comics

    Comics: Sunday, March 29, 2015

    By Creator | From Page: B8