Sunday, August 31, 2014

Bill is an affront to UC Davis ag biotech and local farmers

By Kent Bradford

As a scientist who has dedicated my entire career to agricultural biotechnology and plant science, I am deeply concerned about Senate Bill 1381, which is winding its way through the California Legislature and is scheduled to be heard in the Senate Agriculture Committee on Thursday.

The bill, which mandates a de facto warning label on foods made with the benefits of modern agriculture biotechnology, would greatly impede the cutting-edge research we are conducting here at UC Davis to produce safe, more nutritious and environmentally sustainable crops. The legislation also would provide consumers with misleading information about the foods they buy, hurt our local farmers and food producers, and increase grocery costs for all consumers.

SB 1381 would effectively ban the sale of tens of thousands of perfectly safe, common grocery products in California that contain genetically engineered ingredients unless they are specially repackaged, relabeled or made with higher-cost ingredients. It would mandate complex new food labeling regulations in California that don’t exist in any other state or federally.

The underlying goal of proponents of this legislation is to stigmatize crops and foods made through the process of genetic engineering by mandating a scary-sounding warning label — when there is no scientific justification for such a warning.

Biotechnology, or genetic engineering, has been used for nearly two decades to grow varieties of corn, soybeans and other crops that resist diseases and insects and require fewer pesticides, and it is capable of so much more. For the hundreds of scientists, professors, students and farmers in our region who have dedicated our careers to agriculture and biotechnology, passage of this legislation could put a serious chill on our industry, and especially our university, and deprive consumers and our environment of additional technological discoveries and crop improvements that we can’t even conceive of today.

Thousands of common foods are made with ingredients from biotech crops. There are more than 600 peer-reviewed reports that document the general safety, agricultural benefits and nutritional wholesomeness of genetically engineered crops. Major scientific and medical organizations — including the National Academy of Sciences, World Health Organization and American Medical Association — have all concluded that foods made with GE ingredients are safe.

In fact, the American Medical Association, representing the nation’s doctors, has studied the issue and concluded: “There is no scientific justification for special labeling of bioengineered foods.”

Similarly, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world’s largest scientific society and publisher of Science magazine, says, “GM crops are the most extensively tested crops ever added to our food supply. Legally mandating such a label can only serve to mislead and falsely alarm consumers.”

By requiring a de facto warning label on these perfectly safe foods, SB 1381 promotes fear-based, not science-based, information to consumers.

And that’s exactly the goal of its sponsors. They don’t want to provide information. They want to scare consumers in an attempt to ban all modern biotechnology.

What consequences might passage of SB 1381 have? GE crops have greatly lowered insecticide use in cotton and corn and enabled expansion of conservation tillage in several crops, which dramatically reduces plowing, saves fuel, reduces erosion and results in less dust and carbon dioxide in the air. The beneficial environmental impact has been enormous.

Moreover, the bill would force farmers and food companies to implement costly new labeling, packaging, distribution, record-keeping and other bureaucratic operations that will incur enormous costs. Or, companies will be forced to switch to higher-priced, non-GE ingredients in order to sell food in California.

A study conducted in 2012 by two UCD professors of agricultural economics found that this type of labeling bill would result in $1.2 billion in higher costs for those who grow and make our food in California.

Ultimately, consumers will pay for this through higher costs at the grocery store. In fact, a separate economic study concluded that forcing products to be repackaged or remade with higher priced ingredients would cost the average California family up to $400 per year in higher grocery costs.

SB 1381 also would create a new class of shakedown lawsuits that incentivizes lawyers to sue food companies over the wording on food labels. The legislation actually provides financial incentives for lawyers to file shakedown lawsuits. The last thing our local farmers need is more lawsuits and greater bureaucracy.

Consumers interested in purchasing GE-free foods already can make informed choices. They can buy certified organic food, or buy from companies that voluntarily label food without GE products. We don’t need SB 1381’s costly and confusing new requirements to provide consumers with information about GE foods.

If this all sounds familiar, it should. California voters rejected a similar food labeling measure, Proposition 37, at the ballot just a few years ago. Prop. 37 was defeated by a healthy 12-point margin here in Yolo County.

We hope that legislators will stand up for science and reject higher food prices by voting no on Senate Bill 1381.

— Kent Bradford, Ph.D., is a distinguished professor of plant sciences at UC Davis and director of the university’s Seed Biotechnology Center.



Special to The Enterprise



Davis audience hears from civil-rights hero

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Legislators wrap up with water, ethics, guns bills

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2 | Gallery

Bob Dunning: This new kid might have a future

By Bob Dunning | From Page: A2

Five U.S. airstrikes target Islamic State fighters

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2

EU threatens Russia with more sanctions

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2

Rotary clubs offer Davis High students some life lessons

By Evan Arnold-Gordon | From Page: A3 | Gallery

Robbery, pursuit in Central Davis lead to one arrest

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A3

Bauer garden marks one year

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4

Dinner will raise funds to help farmers in Burkina Faso

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Walkers welcome to join Sierra Club outings

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Beamer Park featured at Stroll Through History

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Yolo Federal to hold photo contest

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Katehi will speak at Chamber’s community luncheon

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Bean Feed supports for Yolo Democrats’ activities

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4 | Gallery

Tuleyome Tales: Be safe on wilderness trails

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A5 | Gallery

Small wineries suffer big losses in quake

By San Francisco Chronicle | From Page: A6 | Gallery

Grande site has been a convoluted saga

By Jeff Hudson | From Page: A7

Say goodbye to summer with a ‘Final Blast’ at Explorit

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A9 | Gallery

Bay Bridge project’s rainy-day money is nearly gone

By San Francisco Chronicle | From Page: A15 | Gallery



Already made herself at home

By Creators Syndicate | From Page: B5

Ad-free email? You can still find it at Davis Community Network

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A10

Keep our green waste piles

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

How to make a good living

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

Nate Beeler cartoon

By Debbie Davis | From Page: A10

Changing local election dates benefits Democrats

By Tom Elias | From Page: A10

City panel working to tighten scrutiny of taxpayer dollars

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A11

Try round-robin storytelling at crafts fair

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A11

Speak out

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A11

Health problems mean he’s checked out

By Creators Syndicate | From Page: A14

Marriage doesn’t mean we agree on everything

By Marion Franck | From Page: A14

This epidemic should scare us

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A14



New coach, new tougher league for DHS football

By Thomas Oide | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Coach likes what she sees from Devil field hockey squad

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1 | Gallery

UCD notebook: Coaches positive about FCS schools ‘playing up’

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Devils open with an impressive volleyball victory

By Spencer Ault | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Stanford scores early, often in opener versus UCD

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Sports briefs: Aggie harriers secure season-opening sweep

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B2 | Gallery

Baseball roundup: Cats win late to pull even with Aces

By Staff and wire reports | From Page: B8







Comings and Goings: Is fro-yo craze melting?

By Wendy Weitzel | From Page: A13 | Gallery

Sutter Davis Hospital honored again as a ‘best place to work’

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A13

Community pools its purchasing power to reduce the cost of solar

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A20

Engage3 attracts investment for shopping app

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A20

California growers can use MBI’s new bioinsecticide

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A20

Sudwerk, Davis Food Co-op join for ‘co-hop-eration’ brew

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A20 | Gallery



Wanda P. Daley

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4



Comics: Sunday, August 31, 2014

By Creator | From Page: B8