Thursday, September 18, 2014

Bill is an affront to UC Davis ag biotech and local farmers

By Kent Bradford

As a scientist who has dedicated my entire career to agricultural biotechnology and plant science, I am deeply concerned about Senate Bill 1381, which is winding its way through the California Legislature and is scheduled to be heard in the Senate Agriculture Committee on Thursday.

The bill, which mandates a de facto warning label on foods made with the benefits of modern agriculture biotechnology, would greatly impede the cutting-edge research we are conducting here at UC Davis to produce safe, more nutritious and environmentally sustainable crops. The legislation also would provide consumers with misleading information about the foods they buy, hurt our local farmers and food producers, and increase grocery costs for all consumers.

SB 1381 would effectively ban the sale of tens of thousands of perfectly safe, common grocery products in California that contain genetically engineered ingredients unless they are specially repackaged, relabeled or made with higher-cost ingredients. It would mandate complex new food labeling regulations in California that don’t exist in any other state or federally.

The underlying goal of proponents of this legislation is to stigmatize crops and foods made through the process of genetic engineering by mandating a scary-sounding warning label — when there is no scientific justification for such a warning.

Biotechnology, or genetic engineering, has been used for nearly two decades to grow varieties of corn, soybeans and other crops that resist diseases and insects and require fewer pesticides, and it is capable of so much more. For the hundreds of scientists, professors, students and farmers in our region who have dedicated our careers to agriculture and biotechnology, passage of this legislation could put a serious chill on our industry, and especially our university, and deprive consumers and our environment of additional technological discoveries and crop improvements that we can’t even conceive of today.

Thousands of common foods are made with ingredients from biotech crops. There are more than 600 peer-reviewed reports that document the general safety, agricultural benefits and nutritional wholesomeness of genetically engineered crops. Major scientific and medical organizations — including the National Academy of Sciences, World Health Organization and American Medical Association — have all concluded that foods made with GE ingredients are safe.

In fact, the American Medical Association, representing the nation’s doctors, has studied the issue and concluded: “There is no scientific justification for special labeling of bioengineered foods.”

Similarly, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world’s largest scientific society and publisher of Science magazine, says, “GM crops are the most extensively tested crops ever added to our food supply. Legally mandating such a label can only serve to mislead and falsely alarm consumers.”

By requiring a de facto warning label on these perfectly safe foods, SB 1381 promotes fear-based, not science-based, information to consumers.

And that’s exactly the goal of its sponsors. They don’t want to provide information. They want to scare consumers in an attempt to ban all modern biotechnology.

What consequences might passage of SB 1381 have? GE crops have greatly lowered insecticide use in cotton and corn and enabled expansion of conservation tillage in several crops, which dramatically reduces plowing, saves fuel, reduces erosion and results in less dust and carbon dioxide in the air. The beneficial environmental impact has been enormous.

Moreover, the bill would force farmers and food companies to implement costly new labeling, packaging, distribution, record-keeping and other bureaucratic operations that will incur enormous costs. Or, companies will be forced to switch to higher-priced, non-GE ingredients in order to sell food in California.

A study conducted in 2012 by two UCD professors of agricultural economics found that this type of labeling bill would result in $1.2 billion in higher costs for those who grow and make our food in California.

Ultimately, consumers will pay for this through higher costs at the grocery store. In fact, a separate economic study concluded that forcing products to be repackaged or remade with higher priced ingredients would cost the average California family up to $400 per year in higher grocery costs.

SB 1381 also would create a new class of shakedown lawsuits that incentivizes lawyers to sue food companies over the wording on food labels. The legislation actually provides financial incentives for lawyers to file shakedown lawsuits. The last thing our local farmers need is more lawsuits and greater bureaucracy.

Consumers interested in purchasing GE-free foods already can make informed choices. They can buy certified organic food, or buy from companies that voluntarily label food without GE products. We don’t need SB 1381’s costly and confusing new requirements to provide consumers with information about GE foods.

If this all sounds familiar, it should. California voters rejected a similar food labeling measure, Proposition 37, at the ballot just a few years ago. Prop. 37 was defeated by a healthy 12-point margin here in Yolo County.

We hope that legislators will stand up for science and reject higher food prices by voting no on Senate Bill 1381.

— Kent Bradford, Ph.D., is a distinguished professor of plant sciences at UC Davis and director of the university’s Seed Biotechnology Center.



Special to The Enterprise

  • Recent Posts

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this newspaper and receive notifications of new articles by email.

  • .


    Jurors see Marsh questioned by police

    By Lauren Keene | From Page: A1

    Grace Garden: Five years of feeding the needy

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A1 | Gallery

    For the record

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A2

    Bike sale on Friday will benefit King High

    By Jeff Hudson | From Page: A2

    Wildfire shows explosive growth

    By The Associated Press | From Page: A2 | Gallery

    Per Capita Davis: What to think

    By John Mott-Smith | From Page: A3

    International Festival moves to park for fourth year

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A3

    Essay contest underway

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4

    Sudwerk Wet Hop Lager plants seeds for area hops rebirth

    By Wendy Weitzel | From Page: A4 | Gallery

    Speakers plumb issues around the Constitution

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

    Governor signs bill to support state’s ailing bee population

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A5

    Backyard poultry symposium Sunday at UCD

    By Tanya Perez | From Page: A5

    Forum will answer questions about new license law

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

    Australian pop band Dick Diver plays Third Space

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

    RepowerYolo hosts solar seminar

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

    Local Girl Scouts are looking for a few good leaders

    By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A5

    Reneau, Silberstein will read their poetry Thursday

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5 | Gallery

    Parents host campaign coffees for Archer

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

    Nominate deserving volunteers for top citizen honors

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

    PG&E, Dixon company unveil truck that can restore power

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A7 | Gallery

    $12M earmarked for UCD life sciences center in Chile

    By Karen Nikos-Rose | From Page: A7



    She’s had it with his neglect

    By Creators Syndicate | From Page: B5

    Off-leash dogs are a danger

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

    Davis makes the NY Times

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

    Affordable housing affects health

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A6

    Choose to wipe out hunger

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A6

    Tom Meyer cartoon

    By Debbie Davis | From Page: A6



    DHS girls pound Mustangs in the pool

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

    Davis captures final nonleague volleyball outing

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1 | Gallery

    DHS golfers blow past St. Francis

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1 | Gallery

    Devils blow out Marauders at Brown Stadium

    By Evan Ream | From Page: B1 | Gallery

    Youth softball: Hurricanes win one of two slugfests with Woodland

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B2 | Gallery

    Youth roundup: These Diamonds are forever in the record books

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B2 | Gallery

    Baseball roundup: Duffy comes up big for Giants in Arizona

    By The Associated Press | From Page: B3

    Young Devil harriers carry the day

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B3

    Davis falls to Vintage in a JV shootout

    By Spencer Ault | From Page: B3

    DHS girls tennis team stunned at Franklin

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B8



    What’s happening, Sept. 18

    By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A8

    Students get into the act with Shakespeare

    By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A8 | Gallery

    Street-smart tips for safe cycling

    By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A8

    Eagle Scout project makes life easier for Yolo Basin volunteers

    By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A10 | Gallery



    Wineaux: Back and forth in the high and low debate

    By Susan Leonardi | From Page: A9

    Catie Curtis brings folk-rock ‘Flying Dream’ to The Palms on Friday Sept. 19

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A9 | Gallery





    Jean Botelli

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4



    Comics: Thursday, September 18, 2014

    By Creator | From Page: B6