Sunday, September 21, 2014

Shouldn’t we be thinking of a nuclear future?


From page A10 | June 25, 2014 |

In a romantic attempt to reduce the real threat of global warming, retail sellers of electricity in California will be required in five and a half years to more than double the share of power they get from renewable sources.

Today, approximately 17.1 percent of in-state generation comes from biomass, geothermal, small hydro, wind and solar. Of the power we import from out of state, 12.2 percent is known to be from these technologies. However, almost half of the electricity we import comes from unknown sources. By 2020, renewables are supposed to make up 33 percent of our portfolio.

In 2012, Californians consumed 302,000 gigawatt hours of electricity. We produced 65.9 percent of that and imported the rest.

Most California-generated electricity (61.1 percent) is derived from natural gas. We produce very little from coal (0.8 percent) or oil (0.045 percent). However, of the known sources of electricity we import, 39.5 percent comes from coal-fired plants.

Not all of the power we produce in-state which is not classified as “renewable” dumps greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Large hydroelectric dams generate 11.7 percent of our electricity; and nuclear power makes up 9.3 percent.

I am not sure why large hydro and nuclear don’t count toward what the state calls its “renewable portfolio standard,” when our ambition is to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gases. Neither of those threatens our climate.

Yet, in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi disaster of 2011, no one is seriously contemplating adding more nuclear power plants to our mix. The last thing “greens” in California want is to risk the meltdown of a reactor core. Additionally, there remains a question of what to do with nuclear waste.

But what if there were a safer nuclear option? One that required almost no uranium or plutonium, did not employ a light-water reactor which requires its water to be cooled under high-pressure, ran on a commonly available fuel source, produced less than one percent as much waste, and its waste were radioactive for a far-shorter horizon than comes out of today’s conventional nuclear power plants?

The answer may be nuclear power from thorium. Or more precisely, a molten salt-cooled liquid-fluoride thorium reactor.

Back in the 1960s, the United States researched the possibility of using thorium in place of uranium. However, when it was found that thorium was a poor fuel for making nuclear bombs—our primary interest at Oak Ridge National Laboratory—we gave up on its promise as a fuel for electric power production.

Today, basing its technology on what we learned 50 years ago, China is poised to become the world’s leader in these safer, greener power plants. According to The Economist, the Chinese Academy of Sciences expects to fire up a prototype thorium reactor in 2015 using solid fuel. The Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics projects to have one in operation that uses molten thorium fluoride by 2017.

The Chinese are collaborating with a group of nuclear engineers from UC Berkeley, led by Per Peterson. Prof. Peterson, whose funding comes from the U.S. Dept. of Energy, has invited me to his lab next month to see “the work we’re doing in high-temperature reactor technology using fluoride molten salt coolants.”

Peterson’s colleague, Prof. Ehud Greenspan, explained to me that what makes thorium safer than uranium are the molten salt coolants.

“Many people also prefer thorium because the nuclear waste it generates is almost free of plutonium, americium and curium,” Greenspan said. “But the thorium waste is not benign; it requires careful handling.”

Yet dealing with nuclear waste from power plants may have a solution. Since 1999, plutonium waste from nuclear weapons has been safely buried deep under ground in salt beds near Carlsbad, New Mexico.

At the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, “holes are bored into walls of rooms carved from salt,” according to the New York Times. “At a rate of six inches a year, the salt closes in on the waste and encapsulates it for what engineers say will be millions of years.”

As The Economist reported in April, waste products from a liquid -fluoride thorium reactor “are less hazardous than those of a light-water reactor. There is less than a hundredth of the quantity and its radioactivity falls to safe levels within centuries, instead of the tens of millennia for light-water waste.”

One technical problem with thorium is that it is not fissile. That is, it cannot be split to make a nuclear chain reaction. That’s why it’s bad for making bombs. Instead, according to Wikipedia, in a liquid-fluoride thorium reactor, “thorium and uranium-233 are dissolved in carrier salts, forming a liquid fuel.

“In a typical operation, the liquid is pumped between a critical core and an external heat exchanger where the heat is transferred to a nonradioactive secondary salt. The secondary salt then transfers its heat to a steam turbine or closed-cycle gas turbine.”

In order to meet the 2020 target for renewables, the California Public Utilities Commission projects a huge increase in solar and wind in the next few years.

Yet even if we meet this mandate, it seems to me there is a need for a safe power source like thorium nuclear, which reliably generates electricity 24 hours a day and does not emit greenhouse gases.

This is especially true if drivers in our state move away from gasoline and diesel engines toward those which run on electricity or hydrogen.

Thorium power may not quite be ready. But once it is, California should be prepared to accept it as a clean source of power which can replace coal, gas and conventional nuclear.

— Rich Rifkin is a Davis resident; his column is published every other week. Reach him at





Bet Haverim hosts High Holy Day services

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A1

Elementary school counselors: necessary, but poorly funded

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Teams assess damage as wildfire burns

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2 | Gallery

Driver arrested for DUI after Saturday morning crash

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A2

Jewelry, art for sale at Senior Center

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

Davis Community Meals needs cooks

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

Help raise funds for juvenile diabetes cure

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

Da Vinci awarded $38,000 for restorative justice program

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A4

Hawk Hill trip planned Sept. 30

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

UC campus chancellors granted hefty pay raises

By The Associated Press | From Page: A4

Send kids to camp!

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Outdoor yoga marathon celebrates community

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A5

Wise words

By Sue Cockrell | From Page: A12



Awareness is key to this fight

By Creators Syndicate | From Page: B5

Are we there yet? Not enough hours in the day to goof off

By Tanya Perez | From Page: A6Comments are off for this post

Where is this going?

By Creators Syndicate | From Page: A6

We’re living in the Golden State of emergency

By Debra DeAngelo | From Page: A6

Options for protection come with flu season

By The Associated Press | From Page: A6

It’s time for Davis Scouts to stand up for what is right

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A10

Mike Keefe cartoon

By Debbie Davis | From Page: A10

Building something at schools’ HQ

By Our View | From Page: A10

Don’t sell city greenbelt

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

Paso Fino project is flawed

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

Paso Fino — it’s not worth it

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

Archer will get my vote

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

Maybe David can beat Goliath again

By Lynne Nittler | From Page: A11 | Gallery

Speak out

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A11



DHS gets on its Morse to beat Edison

By Thomas Oide | From Page: B1 | Gallery

JV Blue Devils drop low-scoring affair

By Spencer Ault | From Page: B2

Four local swimmers qualify for Olympic Trials

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B3

Republic FC’s fairy tale season continues

By Evan Ream | From Page: B3 | Gallery

Wire briefs: Giants rally falls short in San Diego

By The Associated Press | From Page: B3

‘We’re a way better team’ than record, says UCD’s Shaffer

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B4 | Gallery

UCD roundup: Aggie men pound Pomona-Pitzer in the pool

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B4

Davis 15-year-old making a splash in European F4 series

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B8 | Gallery





‘Ladies Foursome’ adds shows

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3



UCD grad’s startup earns kudos at TechCrunch event

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A7

Styles on target for November debut

By Wendy Weitzel | From Page: A7

MBI hires VP of marketing

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A7

Taylor Morrison unveils new Woodland community next weekend

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A9 | Gallery

Rob White: What is an ‘innovation center’?

By Rob White | From Page: A9



Carol L. Walsh

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4



Comics: Sunday, September 21, 2014

By Creator | From Page: B8