Sunday, March 29, 2015

Court orders more study on admissions

From page A6 | July 02, 2013 |

The issue: Justices rule that affirmative action must meet tougher standards

The increasingly conservative Supreme Court did not throw out the use of race as a factor in determining college admission, as some had feared. But in announcing their 7-1 decision last week, the justices sent the University of Texas’ race-sensitive admissions case back to a lower court with a call for a “more demanding standard,” as The New York Times reported.

THE CASE INVOLVED a white Texas woman who sued after being denied a place at the university in Austin, alleging that racial favoritism violated the Constitution’s equal-protection clause. She has since graduated from Louisiana State, leaving behind a legacy in the growing body of affirmative action law.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, said race could be used as a factor in selecting incoming freshmen only after a university concludes “that no workable race-neutral alternative would produce the educational benefits of diversity.”

Elena Kagan recused herself from the decision, having had some contact with the case when she was at the Justice Department, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg voted no on the grounds that affirmative-action cases had been satisfactorily dealt with in earlier decisions “and there is no need for a second look.”

But the other justices, in sending the case back to the Fifth Circuit, called for a much closer second look, known by the courts as “strict scrutiny.”

THE COURT’S DECISION was almost waspish in tone because, over a series of cases going back to 1978, it has developed increasingly stringent standards for when race may be used as a determining factor in college admissions.

Kennedy wrote that it was both the university’s and the judiciary’s obligation to “ensure that each applicant is evaluated as an individual and not in a way that makes the applicant’s race or ethnicity the defining feature of his or her application.”

Admissions officers will now have to bone up on exactly what the court means by “strict scrutiny.”

Partially quoting from earlier decisions, Kennedy wrote, “Strict scrutiny is a searching examination, and the government bears the burden to prove ‘that the reasons for any (racial) classification (are) clearly identified and unquestionably legitimate.’ ”

KENNEDY WROTE that under the tougher standards, lower courts are not permitted “to accept a school’s assertion that its admissions process uses race in a permissible way without closely examining how the process works in practice, yet that is what the District Court and Fifth Circuit did here.”

The federal appeals court will rehear the case under the tougher standards.



  • Recent Posts

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this newspaper and receive notifications of new articles by email.

  • .


    UCD faculty receive lowest pay in the system

    By Tanya Perez | From Page: A1

    Motive for murder-suicide remains a mystery

    By Lauren Keene | From Page: A1 | Gallery

    Davis sewage to get new digs

    By Dave Ryan | From Page: A1

    Where do Davis recyclables go?

    By Felicia Alvarez | From Page: A1 | Gallery

    Human Relations Commission hosts Chávez celebration

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A2

    Friends search for shooting victim’s lost pets

    By Lauren Keene | From Page: A4

    ‘Music as Medicine’ is radio show topic

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A6

    Davis Flower Arrangers meet Wednesday

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A6

    Friendship the topic on radio program

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A6



    These results were meaningless

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: B4

    Survey not representative

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: B4

    Answers on the green waste program

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: B4

    A phone call could have fixed this

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: B4

    Milt Prigee cartoon

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: B4

    Some ‘survey’ …

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: B4

    Mayor’s corner: Looking ahead to spring

    By Dan Wolk | From Page: B5 | Gallery

    A Little Respect for Dr. Foster

    By Nicholas Kristof | From Page: B5

    Universities need more funding

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: B5

    Which experiences count as ‘once in a lifetime’?

    By Marion Franck | From Page: A8

    After a month of no TV news, I’m feeling much better

    By Debra DeAngelo | From Page: A8

    Take a hike for your heart

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A8



    Republic stun Galaxy with repeated history

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

    Bad fourth quarter sinks boys lacrosse

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

    Aggies’ walkoff win clinches series against Riverside

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1 | Gallery

    Aggie softball splits doubleheader

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

    Burns scores shootout winner to lift Sharks

    By The Associated Press | From Page: B2 | Gallery

    UCD women’s tennis dominates at home

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B10 | Gallery







    Millennials are changing our community

    By Rob White | From Page: A9

    With new owner, DAC will Get Fit

    By Wendy Weitzel | From Page: A9 | Gallery

    Grant writing for non-profits workshop set

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A9





    Comics: Sunday, March 29, 2015

    By Creator | From Page: B8