
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We say yes to fluoridation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davisenterprise.com/forum/our-view/we-say-yes-to-fluoridation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/forum/our-view/we-say-yes-to-fluoridation/</link>
	<description>Yolo County, California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:11:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noreen Mazelis</title>
		<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/forum/our-view/we-say-yes-to-fluoridation/comment-page-1/#comment-453321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noreen Mazelis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davisenterprise.com/?p=382646#comment-453321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whoever wrote this &quot;editorial&quot; said &quot;no&quot; to brains.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever wrote this &#8220;editorial&#8221; said &#8220;no&#8221; to brains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/forum/our-view/we-say-yes-to-fluoridation/comment-page-1/#comment-453296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2013 18:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davisenterprise.com/?p=382646#comment-453296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[seems the editor of the Tampa Bay times is also on the board of the Pulitzer prize committee.  where is the objectivity there? The machine and big business pushing Fluoridation is worthy of Carl Rove and the Koch Brothers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems the editor of the Tampa Bay times is also on the board of the Pulitzer prize committee.  where is the objectivity there? The machine and big business pushing Fluoridation is worthy of Carl Rove and the Koch Brothers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/forum/our-view/we-say-yes-to-fluoridation/comment-page-1/#comment-453294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2013 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davisenterprise.com/?p=382646#comment-453294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for taking this courageous stand on such an important public health issue.  The Tampa Bay Times won a 2013 Pulitzer Prize for editorial writing on this very subject and titled it&#039;s final installment of a 10 editorial series &quot;Science Over Scare Tactics.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for taking this courageous stand on such an important public health issue.  The Tampa Bay Times won a 2013 Pulitzer Prize for editorial writing on this very subject and titled it&#8217;s final installment of a 10 editorial series &#8220;Science Over Scare Tactics.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Leonard</title>
		<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/forum/our-view/we-say-yes-to-fluoridation/comment-page-1/#comment-453292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Leonard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2013 15:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davisenterprise.com/?p=382646#comment-453292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fluoridation is unneeded. The health of cities that have it is equal to the health of cities without it. Fluoridation is unwanted. This controversy was settled twice in Davis and the citizens decided against fluoridation. There is no citizen movement for fluoridation, only a rather strong one against it. Why the push for it NOW? Could it be that certain advocates for Measure I will, if fluoridation is approved, get money as a result?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fluoridation is unneeded. The health of cities that have it is equal to the health of cities without it. Fluoridation is unwanted. This controversy was settled twice in Davis and the citizens decided against fluoridation. There is no citizen movement for fluoridation, only a rather strong one against it. Why the push for it NOW? Could it be that certain advocates for Measure I will, if fluoridation is approved, get money as a result?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
