Sunday, September 21, 2014
YOLO COUNTY NEWS
99 CENTS

Davis surface water project options multiplying

By
From page A1 | July 03, 2012 |

The West Sacramento surface water supply project alternative, the one that prompted the Water Advisory Committee to delay its recommendations to the City Council, isn’t just one option, but three.

On Thursday, Carollo Engineers — the engineering firm the city hired to perform the analyses — began its presentation of those three options. The WAC is comparing them against the Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency project that would siphon water from the Sacramento River, treat it and pipe it to Davis and Woodland.

The Woodland-Davis project is estimated to cost $299 million combined, for both cities.

The first of the three options associated with the West Sacramento alternative would be a larger regional project that would supply water from the city of West Sacramento’s existing intake facility (called the Bryte Bend Water Treatment Plant) on the Sacramento River — south of where the Woodland-Davis project would draw its water — to Davis, Woodland and UC Davis.

The large regional option, however, doesn’t seem likely. Before the meeting began, Woodland City Manager Paul Navazio sent a memo to Davis City Manager Steve Pinkerton to say that Woodland is not interested in pursuing any West Sacramento alternatives. Navazio is Davis’ former interim city manager and finance director.

“Based on the analysis we have seen and reviewed, Woodland is not interested in expending resources in further reviewing a West Sacramento option for provision of municipal water to the city of Woodland,” Navazio wrote.

“We do not believe that there are advantages for the city to pursue a West Sacramento alternative, given the cost, risks and questions that still remain.

“Put simply, while the city of Woodland respects the city of Davis’ considerations of alternatives to the current Woodland-Davis Surface Water Project, the city of Woodland is committed to proceeding with the current ‘preferred’ project, whether Davis remains as a project partner, or not.”

Should Woodland hold fast on its position, Davis would have only the two other West Sacramento alternatives to consider.

The next option would have Davis alone buy into West Sacramento’s intake facility and subsequently help pay for the construction needed to accommodate future water demand for the two cities.

The final option also would be a “Davis only” project called the reduced capacity project alternative, where Davis would buy into the West Sacramento intake facility, like the second option, but delay the build-out phase for a period of time that would allow the city to defer the up-front capital costs associated with a larger facility.

Dianna Jensen, principal civil engineer for the city of Davis, laid out costs for the first two West Sacramento alternatives Thursday, in addition to the estimated costs of the Woodland-Davis project.

However, because Carollo Engineers hadn’t finished its analysis of the final West Sacramento option, the WAC wasn’t able to compare all of the projects Thursday.

Up to project delivery, not including operation and maintenance costs of the facilities, the estimated price tag of each option for the city of Davis breaks down as follows:

* Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency (current project proposal): $139.9 million;

* West Sacramento Option 1 (regional facility shared by Davis, Woodland and UC Davis): $110.6 million;

* West Sacramento Option 2 (Davis only plus build-out to accommodate future demand): $140.6 million; and

* West Sacramento Option 3 (Davis only “reduced,” or delay of build-out): to be determined.

At its next meeting on Thursday, July 12, the Water Advisory Committee will hear the costs associated with the last option so it can compare the alternative to the others.

As Pinkerton pointed out at Thursday’s meeting, the entire matter of what project the city of Davis should pursue boils down to a comparison of the rate structures that would result from each option.

Eventually, the WAC, and in turn the City Council, will have to make a determination of what rate structure — based on the cost, type and timing of the project chosen — most fairly suits the city of Davis and its residents and businesses. The committee and the council also must consider water ownership rights and differences in water quality.

However, none of it will matter if Davis voters decide not to approve the project the water committee selects.

The deadline for putting a measure on the November ballot that would ask Davis residents whether they approve the project the WAC has settled upon is fast approaching.

At its meeting next Tuesday, the City Council will hear the recommendation made by the WAC two weeks ago to place a binding measure on the November ballot that would tie the city to whatever outcome a public vote produces.

However, because the meeting agenda also includes the swearing-in ceremony for the three men elected last month — incumbent Dan Wolk and newcomers Lucas Frerichs and Brett Lee — the item may be heard at a special meeting the following week, Tuesday, July 17.

Regardless of when council members do consider the water matter, they not only must decide whether to place a binding or advisory measure on the ballot, they also must finalize the language that will describe the project on which residents are voting.

But because the Water Advisory Committee won’t have its final recommendation and accompanying rate structure to the City Council by the time the Yolo County Elections Office requires ballot language (Aug. 10), the city must get creative on how it crafts the language.

The WAC recommended at its meeting on June 14 that the council place the details of the project and the proposed rate structure on the Proposition 218 notices that will go out to all residents and business owners in September.

Renters, who normally wouldn’t receive Prop. 218 notices, would receive special notices from the city detailing the project details and the corresponding rate structure.

— Reach Tom Sakash at tsakash@davisenterprise.net or (530) 747-8057. Follow him on Twitter @TomSakash

Comments

comments

Tom Sakash

Tom Sakash covers the city beat for The Davis Enterprise. Reach him at tsakash@davisenterprise.net, (530) 747-8057 or @TomSakash.
.

News

Elementary school counselors: necessary, but poorly funded

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A1 | Gallery

 
 
Bet Haverim hosts High Holy Day services

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A1

 
Teams assess damage as wildfire burns

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2 | Gallery

 
Driver arrested for DUI after Saturday morning crash

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A2

Help raise funds for juvenile diabetes cure

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

 
Jewelry, art for sale at Senior Center

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

Davis Community Meals needs cooks

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

 
Send kids to camp!

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

 
Da Vinci awarded $38,000 for restorative justice program

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A4

Hawk Hill trip planned Sept. 30

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

 
UC campus chancellors granted hefty pay raises

By The Associated Press | From Page: A4

 
Outdoor yoga marathon celebrates community

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A5

Wise words

By Sue Cockrell | From Page: A12

 
.

Forum

Awareness is key to this fight

By Creators Syndicate | From Page: B5

 
We’re living in the Golden State of emergency

By Debra DeAngelo | From Page: A6

Options for protection come with flu season

By The Associated Press | From Page: A6

 
Are we there yet? Not enough hours in the day to goof off

By Tanya Perez | From Page: A6Comments are off for this post

Paso Fino — it’s not worth it

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

 
Archer will get my vote

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

It’s time for Davis Scouts to stand up for what is right

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A10

 
Mike Keefe cartoon

By Debbie Davis | From Page: A10

Building something at schools’ HQ

By Our View | From Page: A10

 
Don’t sell city greenbelt

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

Paso Fino project is flawed

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

 
Speak out

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A11

Maybe David can beat Goliath again

By Lynne Nittler | From Page: A11 | Gallery

 
.

Sports

DHS gets on its Morse to beat Edison

By Thomas Oide | From Page: B1 | Gallery

 
JV Blue Devils drop low-scoring affair

By Spencer Ault | From Page: B2

 
Wire briefs: Giants rally falls short in San Diego

By The Associated Press | From Page: B3

Four local swimmers qualify for Olympic Trials

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B3

 
Republic FC’s fairy tale season continues

By Evan Ream | From Page: B3 | Gallery

‘We’re a way better team’ than record, says UCD’s Shaffer

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B4 | Gallery

 
UCD roundup: Aggie men pound Pomona-Pitzer in the pool

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B4

Davis 15-year-old making a splash in European F4 series

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B8 | Gallery

 
.

Features

.

Arts

‘Ladies Foursome’ adds shows

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

 
.

Business

UCD grad’s startup earns kudos at TechCrunch event

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A7

 
Styles on target for November debut

By Wendy Weitzel | From Page: A7

MBI hires VP of marketing

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A7

 
Taylor Morrison unveils new Woodland community next weekend

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A9 | Gallery

Rob White: What is an ‘innovation center’?

By Rob White | From Page: A9

 
.

Obituaries

Carol L. Walsh

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4

 
.

Comics

Comics: Sunday, September 21, 2014

By Creator | From Page: B8