Friday, August 29, 2014
YOLO COUNTY NEWS
99 CENTS

How the city arrived at the proposed rates

By
From page A1 | February 01, 2013 |

* Editor’s note: This is the last in a series of stories examining the proposed Woodland-Davis joint surface water project, including project specifics, the city of Davis’ water utility in general and arguments for and against Measure I in the March 5 mail-only election.

Once the Water Advisory Committee had picked the Woodland-Davis surface water project in October as the preferred option to deliver surface water to Davis, the group then took aim at the water rate structure that the city would need to pay for it.

City staff and the city’s hired rate consultant, Bartle Wells Associates, presented to the WAC several industry-standard rate models to pick from.

Each closely resembled the way the city currently bills its residents for water: with a fixed rate based on meter size and a variable rate based on consumption. These types of rate models were, in their opinion, industry-standard and compliant with Proposition 218. That voter-approved measure sets the state law for how a public agency can extend, impose or increase utility fees, including for water.

One rate model that Bartle Wells suggested was a three-tiered inclining block rate structure that charges customers more for water when they reach a certain level of usage, in addition to the base fixed fee determined by meter size.

Bartle Wells originally recommended that the first tier cover 1 to 10 ccf of usage, the second to cover 11-29 ccf and the third 30 and over, with the cost per hundred cubic feet (ccf) rising as use climbed up the ladder.

The second option again included a base fixed fee, but then a uniform-block rate for the variable portion of the rate structure. Under that structure, regardless of how much water a user consumes, the cost per ccf stays the same.

But two water committee members — Frank Loge, a UC Davis professor of civil and environmental engineering, and Matt Williams, an El Macero resident — found the standard models flawed.

“While meter size-based fixed rates seem proportional and fair at first sight, they are a simplistic, indirect and inexact measure of proportionality,” the pair wrote in a handout for a presentation they gave to the WAC in September.

“Meter size-based rate schemes are … based on the potential demand, rather than the actual demand a consumer places on the (water) system.”

The two determined that any household of the same meter size pays the exact same fixed fee regardless of how much water they use, which is disproportionate considering the different loads various households put on the city’s water infrastructure.

“Thrifty and extravagant water users pay the same fixed fee, but derive entirely different benefits from the system they fund with their fixed fees,” the committee members wrote. “The thrifty user’s fixed fees (actually) cover some of the fixed costs the wasteful user imparts on the system, in effect subsidizing the water waster.”

Loge explained it by saying that “roughly half of the people in Davis are subsidizing the water use of the other half.”

A new fixed rate

Loge and Williams developed a rate structure that broke down a customer’s water bill even further to appropriately assign fixed costs based on consumption. Their model, like the industry standard, charged a base fee determined by meter size and a variable fee based on consumption. But unlike traditional rate models, the structure charged a third fee based on historical or previous usage.

To calculate the third consumption-based fixed rate, the city would look at how much money it needed to receive from its customers to pay off its own fixed water costs and then divide that number, proportionally, among all water customers based on how much water they used the previous year.

So if a water customer made up 1 percent of the city’s overall water usage, it would pay 1 percent of the city’s fixed revenue requirement.

The rate model also encouraged conservation, as ratepayers would know that they could potentially reduce the cost of their water bill next year by using less.

It was, as many in the city and on the water committee came to agree, the fairest way to bill ratepayers for water.

Though city staff were hesitant to consider the untested rate structure, they conferred with attorneys and with Bartle Wells to see if the model could work and also if it would pass muster under Prop. 218 proportionality. (The rates are being challenged by a class action lawsuit filed Thursday in Yolo Superior Court.)

The city describes the consumption-based fixed rate model this way: “The supply-charge fee is calculated by using the projected annual revenue requirement related to water supply and treatment and dividing it by the total projected six-month peak period (May through October) water use of the water utility to produce a per-ccf rate.

“The individual fee per customer is then calculated by taking the per-ccf rate and multiplying it by the individual customer’s prior year’s six-month peak period water use. Each year, this CBFR amount is recalculated based on an individual’s actual water use during the prior six-month May-through-October peak consumption period. So for Jan. 1, 2015, the May-October of 2014 total volume will be used. The supply charge will comprise approximately 67 percent of an average monthly water bill.”

While perhaps complex, the city felt comfortable enough that it could print this rate structure on Prop. 218 notices that are sent to property owners to inform them of pending rate increases.

The notices must include the proposed rate structure and an equation for customers to calculate their future water bills. And with the revised Loge-Williams model, the city could accomplish this.

So, with the city’s approval, the CBFR and two Bartle Wells industry-standard rate structures were all viable options for the WAC to pick from.

Six-hour debate

In November, the committee held two three-hour meetings to debate which rate structure it should recommend to the City Council.

Some felt they should just continue on with industry standard, that the CBFR model was too complex to explain or would be too vulnerable to legal challenge.

But then, the committee was reminded, this is Davis.

“Nothing about this project we’ve done is innovative,” David Purkey, a WAC alternate, said at the meeting. “(But) this is Davis. This is something for us to do, something innovative, and if someone is going to innovate this type of reform … I think that we should be the ones to do it.”

After six hours of debate, the committee recommended CBFR to the council on an 8-2 vote.

It appeared the bold move would be short-lived, however, as the council rejected the recommendation, instead asking the WAC to pick one of the standard structures for simplicity’s sake.

But the WAC stood firm and again voted to recommend the CBFR model.

The council eventually found a compromise. At its next meeting, the council determined that if it was going to go with CBFR, it couldn’t implement it immediately without warning customers that their previous usage would affect their current water bills.

Instead, the council elected to approve an inclining-block rate tiered structure — with the first tier set at 18 ccf per month to accommodate larger families — for the first two years of the rate schedule, and then implement the CBFR model with a uniform block variable rate starting in 2015.

This rate schedule would allow the city ample opportunity to educate the public on how their rates would be calculated in the future, based on historical consumption.

On Jan. 15, the council unanimously approved the rate structure.

Prop. 218 notices

The city mailed Prop. 218 notices this week that explain how to calculate future water rates based on the rate models the WAC and City Council selected. Property owners have until March 19 to protest the five-year rate schedule the council signed off on in January.

The council will conduct a public hearing that night at which it will adopt the rates unless more than half of the roughly 16,500 property owners in Davis lodge protests.

Under the hybrid-rate model, the average consumer using about 15 ccf of water per month would pay $35.78 monthly starting May 1.

By Jan. 1, 2015, a single-family home user consuming 15 ccf per month, with a peak six-month usage of 120 ccf, would pay $61.51 per month.

By Jan. 1, 2018, a single-family home user consuming 15 ccf per month, with the same peak usage of 120 ccf, would pay $98.27 per month.

 — Reach Tom Sakash at tsakash@davisenterprise.net or 530-747-8057. Follow him on Twitter at @TomSakash

Comments

comments

Tom Sakash

Tom Sakash covers the city beat for The Davis Enterprise. Reach him at tsakash@davisenterprise.net, (530) 747-8057 or @TomSakash.
  • Recent Posts

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this newspaper and receive notifications of new articles by email.

  • .

    News

    Davis Innovation Center team fields questions

    By Dave Ryan | From Page: A1 | Gallery

     
    Saving Putah Creek: a quiet concert at sunset

    By Elizabeth Case | From Page: A1 | Gallery

    Mr. Dolcini goes to Washington

    By Tanya Perez | From Page: A1 | Gallery

     
    Winton to be feted for her many years of community work

    By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: A1 | Gallery

    Researchers solve mystery of Death Valley’s moving rocks

    By The Associated Press | From Page: A2 | Gallery

     
    California extends review of $25B delta plan

    By The Associated Press | From Page: A2

     
    Assembly approves statewide ban on plastic bags

    By The Associated Press | From Page: A2

    Equestrian eventing competition slated

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

     
    Dinner, auction benefit Yolo County CASA

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

    Forum explores local mental health services

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

     
    Solar-cooking workshop set at Food Co-op

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

    Celebrate the Senior Center at Sept. 9 luncheon

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

     
    Need a new best friend?

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3 | Gallery

    Kids can sign up for a library card and get a free book

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4

     
    Explorit Science Center: Volunteers supercharge summer camp

    By Lisa Justice | From Page: A4 | Gallery

    Tee off for Davis’ continued prosperity

    By Lily Holmes | From Page: A4

     
     
    Bodega Marine Laboratory hosts open house

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A5 | Gallery

    Local group charts a year’s worth of beauty in flowers

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

     
    Free blood pressure screenings offered

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

    Name Droppers: UCD honors two of its own

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A6

     
    Books, conversation and poetry at Logos

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A7

     
    .

    Forum

    Let’s sell the MRAP on eBay

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: C2

     
    Seeing both sides of ‘tank’

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: C2

    What if we need MRAP?

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: C2

     
    How could tank be helpful?

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: C2

     
    Tom Meyer cartoon

    By Debbie Davis | From Page: C2

    Don’t sentence our police to death

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: C2, 1 Comment

     
    Will Davis see river water?

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: C2

    Travel buddy is getting too fat

    By Creators Syndicate | From Page: B5

     
    .

    Sports

    UCD-Stanford: the clock is down to counting the minutes

    By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1

     
    Forget the score; focus on the energy brought by Aggies

    By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1

    Returning seniors, new faces lead promising DHS links squad

    By Evan Ream | From Page: B1 | Gallery

     
    Devil golfers return from Scotland with smiles on their faces

    By Evan Ream | From Page: B1 | Gallery

    Devils scrimmage with Sac

    By Wayne Tilcock | From Page: B1 | Gallery

     
    Sports briefs: DHS girls fall by the slimmest of net margins

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B6 | Gallery

    Wire briefs: Aces cruise past Cats at Raley

    By Wire and staff reports | From Page: B6

     
    .

    Features

    .

    Arts

    ‘The November Man’: Who can be trusted?

    By Derrick Bang | From Page: A9 | Gallery

     
    B Street’s ‘The Ladies Foursome’ is aces

    By Bev Sykes | From Page: A9 | Gallery

    .

    Business

    Technology makes a great car better

    By Ali Arsham | From Page: C1 | Gallery

     
    .

    Obituaries

    Margarita Elizondo

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4

     
    Elaine Dracia Greenberg

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4

    .

    Comics