Thursday, April 24, 2014

Site location leads city leaders towards residential development of The Cannery

From page A1 | September 15, 2013 | 5 Comments

The Cannery series

Part 1: The history and final design

Part 2: Impact on surrounding neighborhoods

Part 3: Senior housing

Part 4: Sustainability

Part 5: Cannery Farm

Part 6: Business park vs. residential

This is Part 6 of an ongoing series discussing the various aspects of The Cannery project.

The City Council will consider the final design of the residential development over several meetings in October and November, after the city’s Planning Commission reviews this month. The project is not subject to Measure J/R, which requires voter approval of any proposal to convert county farmland into residential use in the city.


As long as there have been proposals to develop The Cannery site in North Davis into a residential neighborhood, there also has been support in the community to build a business park there instead.

Fears abound, even at the City Council level at times, of Davis continuing to evolve into a bedroom community, where people live in town but commute out to places like Sacramento or the Bay Area every morning for work.

Meanwhile, stagnant sales tax revenues and rumors of more large businesses absconding from Davis, similar to Bayer CropScience, formerly AgraQuest, who left town earlier this year in search of larger — and cheaper — land and facilities in West Sacramento, put even more pressure on the local economy.

Some city leaders have viewed this site, a 100-acre vacant parcel and the last large piece of undeveloped land within city limits, as a chance to reverse that trend and bring the jobs and the industry here.

So, the question arises, before the council approves the final design of The Cannery and indelibly locks in 547 units of housing and only a small percentage of space for industrial use: What does the city really need? More business parks, or more housing?

Based on the location of the site, Councilwoman Rochelle Swanson, who’s perhaps the most outspoken advocate on the council for economic development in Davis, says she’s comfortable with the residential-to-business park distribution in the proposal.

ConAgra Foods has carved out about seven acres of the 100 available for business park use.

“We have assets that can’t be replicated anywhere else,” Swanson said Saturday. “So while on one hand, yes, do we need to have business park space, an innovation park? I (think we) do, and I still hold to the fact that the market will bear out at a location other than The Cannery, something closer to Mace (Boulevard) as a better option. But we also have to have a place for people to live.”

Swanson added that considering the demographics and the residential needs of the community, the city should focus on market rate affordable housing and housing that can serve seniors who are looking to downsize, both of which could be accommodated by the project.

The location of the site — at the northeast corner of East Covell Boulevard and F Street — in relation to the rest of the city, meanwhile, has been a problem for business park prospects in the past.

About seven years ago, when Lewis Planned Communities was developing the property, the City Council was still interested in building out the site as a business park.

Lewis hired Colliers International, a company that specializes in luring businesses away from the Bay Area and down the I-80 corridor, to gauge the interest level in The Cannery site as a business park.

Jon Quick, a Davis resident and the vice president of that company, recalls not having very much success.

“The site alone has challenges because of the access,” Quick said this week. “It’s not exactly near any freeways, it’s kind of buried in town … so it’s difficult to find a bigger (company) to come in that would have employees, vendors, coming not from Davis but from all over. It would create traffic issues.

“The access is just not conducive when you’ve got better located properties in Solano County or West Sac or other places where it’s a quicker on and off (the interstate).”

Perhaps most disturbing, however, was that after targeting commercial developers and technology based companies throughout Northern California, Colliers found that, aside from lacking market depth and the access issues, one of the main concerns with the site was Davis politics.

Quick recalls that developers were put off by the lengthy entitlement process they’d surely have to maneuver through in Davis, especially considering the turbulent community discourse that clouded the Target decision, which passed by a mere 674 votes back in 2006.

“The biggest concerns addressed by every candidate has been regarding uncertain zoning and the entitlement process,” the report said. “A ‘public vote’ perception was prevalent among these developers further adding to the skepticism of an efficient entitlement process (Target example).”

Even given those concerns, however, there are some in the community who still feel that a business park could work on The Cannery site.

Mike Hart, president of Sierra Energy Corp., says the site would better serve Davis in the long-run if the council reversed course and dedicated the site for industrial use only.

Hart says the studies ConAgra has referenced about the slow, 40-year absorption rate — or the time it would take for a full business park to be built out — are outdated.

If the property were put on the market as a business or industrial park and separated into smaller parcels for purchase, they would be snatched up in an instant, Hart said.

“I believe you would have more (companies) than you know what to do with,” said Hart, who moved his research and development operations to West Sacramento in 2003 because there was not sufficient space in Davis.

Hart also points to the low-cost of the land, which compared to sites in the Bay Area, would be quite attractive for businesses to move.

Further, even if the property took 40 years to build out, Hart added, the wait would be irrelevant considering the permanence of the housing development. For the benefit of Davis in the long-term, even waiting for the park to flourish would be more beneficial than building a residential neighborhood.

“I feel that turning this property into housing is a tragedy with very long-term effects for the city, job-creation and retaining new industry,” Hart wrote in an email to the City Council to urge them to reconsider approving this project.

But ConAgra has never shown an interest in developing the project as a business park.

Last month, George Phillips, spokesperson for the food corporation told The Enterprise that the site’s industrial zoning may have been appropriate several decades ago, but the city has developed residential neighborhoods around it, which has drastically reduced the viability of a business park there.

“Today,” Phillips said, “if the city was looking at logical business park locations, this would not be one.”

Rob White, the city’s freshly hired chief innovation officer, who was brought in to fire up the local economy — with perhaps his principal task being to bring new, high-tech businesses to Davis — says that, considering the location of the site, a business park would not be the best use of the land.

“For Davis, all evidence seems to indicate (100 percent business park) would not be viable,” White said in an email. “My evidence for this is that we have yet to find a single user that would be willing to pay for any significant acreage on The Cannery site at market price.”

As the project is proposed now, of the 15 acres that are cropped out for commercial/mixed-use space, a little less than half would be open for traditional business park uses.

Phillips says that he would expect businesses like normal offices, start-up companies, tech-related companies, mid-size and small businesses to move into the space.

“Absorption will be market driven, but we anticipate a three- to five-year build out from the start of on-site construction,” Phillips said in an email, adding that ConAgra has been contacted by a number of businesses inquiring about the property with an interest in possibly locating there.

Apparently unidentified members of the local seed industry have been interested in the project as well.

White says that the site provides enough space for labs ranging from 20,000 to 30,000 square feet, which he hopes businesses would see as an appropriate size to move their operations.

“City leadership has been told in casual conversation by some of the seed researchers that the housing is a needed piece to the puzzle for them to locate in Davis and grow their businesses,” White said. “I speculate it would be a significant attraction to have several companies in that business park be able to live nearby, so they could have the live/work balance many people describe as a desirable outcome.”

Hart has said that he would be willing to cobble together a referendum campaign to collect signatures and put the project up for a public vote if the council decides to approve the project. This week he said that he’s also been approached by several members of the community who are poised to spearhead that effort as well.

But if the vote doesn’t happen and the council elects to approve the project, Hart’s only request is to make sure the final product benefits Davis.

“At least make a good deal,” Hart said. “What’s currently begin proposed is a complete disaster. (Davis) gets nothing except a bunch more houses and no additional revenue to the city … no net benefit for the community.”

— Reach Tom Sakash at or 530-747-8057. Follow him on Twitter at @TomSakash

Tom Sakash

Tom Sakash covers the city beat for The Davis Enterprise. Reach him at, (530) 747-8057 or @TomSakash.

Discussion | 5 comments

The Davis Enterprise does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy

  • September 15, 2013 - 12:24 am

    This is the Davis Enterprise at its worst. Tom could have interviewed more than a dozen other serious executives in Davis and he chose the guy with an axe to grind.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • September 15, 2013 - 12:36 pm

    Where are the hard numbers!?? How much would it cost a business owner to buy a lot here, versus in West Sac or Vacaville? And what kind of tax revenues would the city realize, versus residential housing (minor)? Will ConAgra reap a one-time windfall, but the city loses a new potential tax base? As far as city politics, we just saw half of the food trucks at an Aggie football game turned away due to city policies / politics, which I've never heard happen anywhere else in Sacramento or the Bay Area. Another issue is, what would the city do with additional monies? Pay for the new water treatment plant, waste it, or what? I'll take art's input as more valid than another government official. Put it to a vote.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Rich RifkinSeptember 15, 2013 - 3:15 pm

    "As far as city politics, we just saw half of the food trucks at an Aggie football game turned away due to city policies / politics, which I've never heard happen anywhere else in Sacramento or the Bay Area." ...... I'm quite certain this could not happen. The Aggies play football on campus, far from the city limit. So if any food trucks were turned away at one of their games, it would have nothing to do with any city policies.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Rich RifkinSeptember 15, 2013 - 3:32 pm

    "Will ConAgra reap a one-time windfall, but the city loses a new potential tax base?" ...... Yes and no. ConAgra stands to make a killing, if Davis rezones that parcel from its current "high-tech industry" usage to (mostly) residential. Every square foot of the 100 acres of land will be worth far more, redounding to ConAgra's benefit. On the other hand, the new, higher valued properties of the Cannery development will not represent a loss to the city's tax base. Just the opposite. The property taxes paid will vastly increase, and the city of Davis will capture its 20.0449% share of the increase. (Other big winners would be Yolo County, 11.5929%; DJUSD, 56.1657%; and Los Rios Comm. Colleges, 4.4478%.) ...... It is theoretically possible that if the site were developed for some high-tech industry (which may never want to locate there), and that high tech industry includes very expensive machinery (on which companies must pay property tax, too), that there is a higher potential tax gain for the city in that use. But that, at this point, seems unlikely. And compared with the present situation, a housing development represents a great increase in money flowing into the city's coffers, as well as the schools' and the county's.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • September 15, 2013 - 12:39 pm

    Typo. I meant to write that I'll take Mike Hart's input over a government official.

    Reply | Report abusive comment


Food insecurity remains an issue for many county residents

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A1

4-H members prepare for Spring Show

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A1

Youth sports in focus on radio program

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Rummage sale will benefit preschool

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Concert benefits South Korea exchange

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Conference puts focus on Arab studies

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Central Park Gardens to host Volunteer Orientation Day

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5 | Gallery

Volkssporting Club plans North Davis walks

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

Hotel/conference center info meeting set

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

Davis honors ‘green’ citizens

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

Water rate assistance bill advances

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

Program explores STEM careers for girls

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

Embroiderers plan a hands-on project

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

Cycle de Mayo benefits Center for Families

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A8

Author to read ‘The Cat Who Chose to Dream’

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A12



Ortiz is the right choice for Yolo

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

Tom Meyer cartoon

By Debbie Davis | From Page: A6

The high cost of employment

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

High-five to Union Bank

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

Broken sprinklers waste water

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

Three more administrators?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

Neustadt has experience for the job

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

Here’s a plan to save big on employee costs

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A6

Davis is fair, thoughtful

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6



DHS/Franklin II is a close loss for Devil softballers

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

DHS tracksters sweep another DVC meet

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Another DVC blowout for DHS girls soccer

By Evan Ream | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Young reinvents his game to help Aggies improve on the diamond

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1 | Gallery

DHS boys shuffle the deck to beat Cards

By Thomas Oide | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Baseball roundup: Giants slam Rockies in the 11th

By The Associated Press | From Page: B2

UCD roundup: Aggies lose a softball game at Pacific

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B3

Jahn jumps to Sacramento Republic FC

By Evan Ream | From Page: B8





Emerson, Da Vinci to present ‘Once Upon a Mattress’

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A11

Winters Plein Air Festival begins Friday

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A11

Bach Soloists wrap up season on April 28

By Jeff Hudson | From Page: A11

Congressional art competition open to high school students

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A11







Comics: Thursday, April 24, 2014

By Creator | From Page: B6