
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yolo DA won&#8217;t prosecute Occupy UC Davis protesters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/crime-fire-courts/yolo-da-wont-prosecute-occupy-uc-davis-protesters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/crime-fire-courts/yolo-da-wont-prosecute-occupy-uc-davis-protesters/</link>
	<description>Yolo County, California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:11:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occupy Riverside: UC Police Again Abuse Protesters Video &#124; Occupy Portland News</title>
		<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/crime-fire-courts/yolo-da-wont-prosecute-occupy-uc-davis-protesters/comment-page-1/#comment-110188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Occupy Riverside: UC Police Again Abuse Protesters Video &#124; Occupy Portland News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davisenterprise.com/?p=128491#comment-110188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] All charges were dropped. So yet again they abuse their authority and arrest for specious reasons or how the district attorney put it: insufficient information contained within the police reports [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] All charges were dropped. So yet again they abuse their authority and arrest for specious reasons or how the district attorney put it: insufficient information contained within the police reports [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Kuperberg</title>
		<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/crime-fire-courts/yolo-da-wont-prosecute-occupy-uc-davis-protesters/comment-page-1/#comment-107570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Kuperberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davisenterprise.com/?p=128491#comment-107570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though the University of California is called one university, and the different branches are called campuses, really in a lot of ways the campuses are a federation of separate universities.  They have separate admissions, separate hiring, and separate management.  A lot of general policies are the same, but each campus makes its own decisions in specific situations.

In this case, the students who disrupted the meeting were students who had been invited inside to talk to the Regents.  There wasn&#039;t any confrontation between them and any police inside, who also didn&#039;t display riot gear.  Instead, when these students brought down the meeting, the Regents left the room and reconvened in another part of the building.

Outside, other protesters tried to enter the building and cut off the Regents&#039; exits.  There was a confrontation at the rear loading dock when students passed forward a grill barrier toward the police.  The police used air-gun pellets of some kind to confiscate the barrier and stand their ground.  Whether these police were justified in their actions is something that can be investigated.  What&#039;s clear is that this scene was very different in a lot of ways from what happened at UC Davis.  Here the police were guarding university officials in a surrounded building.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though the University of California is called one university, and the different branches are called campuses, really in a lot of ways the campuses are a federation of separate universities.  They have separate admissions, separate hiring, and separate management.  A lot of general policies are the same, but each campus makes its own decisions in specific situations.</p>
<p>In this case, the students who disrupted the meeting were students who had been invited inside to talk to the Regents.  There wasn&#8217;t any confrontation between them and any police inside, who also didn&#8217;t display riot gear.  Instead, when these students brought down the meeting, the Regents left the room and reconvened in another part of the building.</p>
<p>Outside, other protesters tried to enter the building and cut off the Regents&#8217; exits.  There was a confrontation at the rear loading dock when students passed forward a grill barrier toward the police.  The police used air-gun pellets of some kind to confiscate the barrier and stand their ground.  Whether these police were justified in their actions is something that can be investigated.  What&#8217;s clear is that this scene was very different in a lot of ways from what happened at UC Davis.  Here the police were guarding university officials in a surrounded building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/crime-fire-courts/yolo-da-wont-prosecute-occupy-uc-davis-protesters/comment-page-1/#comment-107487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davisenterprise.com/?p=128491#comment-107487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If UCD considers the events of November 18th &quot;regrettable&quot;, what do they consider the events of January 19th at UC Riverside, where police in riot gear actually shot &#039;non-lethal&#039; projectiles into a crowd of protesters who had disrupted a UC regents meeting?  To me, an apology (assuming declaring something &#039;regrettable&#039; is any sort of apology) means you understood your mistake and you do not repeat that mistake, much less escalate the same mistake.  There is a slight chance UCD administration may have learned something, whether for the right or wrong reason.  UC, as such, clearly has learned nothing from the events of November.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If UCD considers the events of November 18th &#8220;regrettable&#8221;, what do they consider the events of January 19th at UC Riverside, where police in riot gear actually shot &#8216;non-lethal&#8217; projectiles into a crowd of protesters who had disrupted a UC regents meeting?  To me, an apology (assuming declaring something &#8216;regrettable&#8217; is any sort of apology) means you understood your mistake and you do not repeat that mistake, much less escalate the same mistake.  There is a slight chance UCD administration may have learned something, whether for the right or wrong reason.  UC, as such, clearly has learned nothing from the events of November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
