Friday, August 29, 2014

Davis trustees modify school parcel tax

From page A1 | August 16, 2013 |

Acknowledging court decisions earlier this year striking down portions of a school parcel tax in Alameda County, the Davis Board of Education voted Thursday to take out portions of the district’s recently approved parcel tax, Measure E, that would have charged local single-family homes and multi-unit dwellings at different tax rates.

The board’s decision means that Measure E will now charge local property owners at a uniform rate of $204 per parcel per year.

The tax was approved by Davis voters — by a 69-31 percent majority — on Nov. 6, 2012. Measure E will be in effect for four years (July 2013-June 2017).

Designed to partially offset repeated reductions in state funding for education over the past five years, Measure E went before local voters as dual-rate measure, charging $204 annually for single-family homes, and $20 per unit annually for multi-unit dwellings. The rationale was that people living in apartments, duplexes and condominiums should bear a lighter tax burden.

But Measure E also included a severability clause stating, “should any part of the measure be found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid for any reason, all remaining parts of the measure or taxing formula hereof shall remain in full force and effect to the fullest extent allowed by law.”

A lawsuit challenging a dual-rate parcel tax already was underway in Alameda County. In March, in a case known as Borikas v. Alameda Unified School District, the California Court of Appeals invalidated a portion of a dual-rate school parcel tax there, ruling that California law requires that parcel taxes charge a uniform rate for all types of parcels.

The Alameda district appealed the Borikas decision to the California Supreme Court, which declined to hear the case in June, thereby making the Court of Appeals ruling final.

Earlier this year, local anti-parcel tax activist Jose Granda  and other tax opponents filed a lawsuit in Yolo County Superior Court, challenging Davis’ Measure E on much the same grounds cited in the Borikas lawsuit. The attorney representing Granda and other plaintiffs — David Brillant, of Walnut Creek — handled the Alameda case. The Davis lawsuit has not gone to trial.

In recognition of the fact that the Measure E suit has not been withdrawn, Davis school board trustees and senior district administrators spoke only briefly, from prepared statements, during Thursday’s meeting. In a news release, the district framed the board’s decision to sever the dual-rate aspects of Measure E and adopt a uniform $204 per parcel tax rate as an effort “to implement Measure E in accordance with the intent of the voters and consistent with current legal requirements.”

“As a result, the district has decided to implement Measure E in a way that is consistent with Borikas by levying one uniform rate for all parcels of taxable real property. … Exemptions for seniors and the disabled remain unaffected,” the news release said.

School board president Sheila Allen told The Enterprise, “The district is being proactive in implementing Measure E in accordance with the intent of the Davis school district voters and the recent legal requirements imposed by the Borikas decision.”

Added Associate Superintendent Bruce Colby, “The large majority of (local) parcels will not be impacted. … Some (multi-dwelling-unit parcels) will see an elimination of the tax. Others will see a varying degree of increase or decrease. In no cases will parcels incur more than $204 per parcel.”

Speaking at Thursday’s school board meeting, Granda had a different interpretation: “The fact that you are holding this (public) hearing is recognition that you have lost this case.” He suggested that instead of severing portions of Measure E, the school board should allow the lawsuit to go to trial, and let the legal process “take its course.”

Granda also asserted that the decision to exercise the severability clause might not pass legal muster.

“(This) is not what voters voted on,” Granda said. “You cannot change ballot language and you cannot change results. You should refrain from doing this. You invite (further) litigation.”

Local property owners will not see the first charge under Measure E until this fall, when the Yolo County treasurer-tax collector sends out the 2013-14 property tax bills.

— Reach Jeff Hudson at or 530-747-8055.



  • Recent Posts

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this newspaper and receive notifications of new articles by email.

  • .


    Saving Putah Creek: a quiet concert at sunset

    By Elizabeth Case | From Page: A1

    Mr. Dolcini goes to Washington

    By Tanya Perez | From Page: A1 | Gallery

    Winton to be feted for her many years of community work

    By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: A1 | Gallery

    Forum explores local mental health services

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

    Celebrate the Senior Center at Sept. 9 luncheon

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

    Dinner, auction benefit Yolo County CASA

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

    Solar-cooking workshop set at Food Co-op

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

    Need a new best friend?

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3 | Gallery

    Equestrian eventing competition slated

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

    Tee off for Davis’ continued prosperity

    By Lily Holmes | From Page: A4

    Kids can sign up for a library card and get a free book

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4

    Explorit Science Center: Volunteers supercharge summer camp

    By Lisa Justice | From Page: A4 | Gallery

    Bodega Marine Laboratory hosts open house

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A5 | Gallery

    Local group charts a year’s worth of beauty in flowers

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

    Free blood pressure screenings offered

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

    Name Droppers: UCD honors two of its own

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: A6



    Let’s sell the MRAP on eBay

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: C2

    Seeing both sides of ‘tank’

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: C2

    What if we need MRAP?

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: C2

    How could tank be helpful?

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: C2

    Tom Meyer cartoon

    By Debbie Davis | From Page: C2

    Don’t sentence our police to death

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: C2

    Will Davis see river water?

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: C2



    Forget the score; focus on the energy brought by Aggies

    By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1

    Returning seniors, new faces lead promising DHS links squad

    By Evan Ream | From Page: B1 | Gallery

    Devil golfers return from Scotland with smiles on their faces

    By Evan Ream | From Page: B1 | Gallery

    Devils scrimmage with Sac

    By Wayne Tilcock | From Page: B1 | Gallery

    UCD-Stanford: the clock is down to counting the minutes

    By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1

    Sports briefs: DHS girls fall by the slimmest of net margins

    By Enterprise staff | From Page: B6 | Gallery

    Wire briefs: Aces cruise past Cats at Raley

    By Wire and staff reports | From Page: B6





    ‘The November Man’: Who can be trusted?

    By Derrick Bang | From Page: A9 | Gallery

    B Street’s ‘The Ladies Foursome’ is aces

    By Bev Sykes | From Page: A9 | Gallery



    Technology makes a great car better

    By Ali Arsham | From Page: C1 | Gallery



    Elaine Dracia Greenberg

    By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4