Thursday, April 24, 2014
YOLO COUNTY NEWS
99 CENTS

Bob Dunning: Plastic bag law infringes no rights

BobDunning2W

By
From page A2 | January 08, 2014 | 4 Comments

Thanks to a kind reader looking out for my best interests, I now have in front of me an article from the San Francisco Chronicle titled “Appeals court upholds S.F. plastic bag ban as precedent.”
“In the latest legal setback for plastic bag makers,” begins the story under Bob Egelko’s byline, “a state appeals court has issued a ruling upholding San Francisco’s ban on single-use plastic bags as a precedent for future cases.”
Fair enough. Which means Davis’ recently passed plastic bag ban almost certainly will survive any and all court challenges as well.
“The ordinance, which the Board of Supervisors passed in February 2012, applies to all retail stores and groceries,” the story goes on, “expanding a narrower 2007 law that covered supermarkets and pharmacies. It prohibits plastic bags that can be used only once and requires stores to charge 10 cents for recyclable plastic or paper bags. Similar measures are in effect in about 50 cities and counties in California and have survived legal challenges.”
In a 3-0 opinion published last Friday, 1st District Court of Appeals Justice Paul Haerle noted that “evidence supports the city’s conclusion that its ordinance, by banning some bags and charging a fee for others, can only benefit the environment.”
What’s odd about the decision is not the affirmative ruling itself, but the court’s reasoning. Last time I checked, there is no requirement that the law must perform as those passing it assumed it would.
Otherwise, you couldn’t have laws against drunken driving unless you could prove such laws actually cut down on the incidences of drunken driving. Or you couldn’t have speed limits unless you could prove they actually cut down on accidents. Or you couldn’t have laws against 10-year-olds buying cigarettes unless you could prove they actually prevent 10-year-olds from smoking.
The real questions for state and federal courts concern the law’s compatibility with state or federal constitutions and whether the law unfairly targets one group and exempts another.
In other words, if Davis’ ordinance says single-use plastic bags are banned only at Nugget, but not at Safeway, Nugget would have a strong case on its hands. Or if it said that East Davis residents have to pay a dime for paper bags, but everyone else in town can have them for free, beleaguered Eastsiders likely would win the day if any of them could afford a lawyer.
But even if the ordinance fails to help the environment in the way lawmakers envisioned, there would be no basis for the court to overturn it. Nothing in the constitution says laws have to work.
The lawsuit was brought by the industry-backed Save the Plastic Bag Coalition, which argued that “paper bags take more energy to produce than plastic, leading to an increase in greenhouse gases, and also occupy more space in landfills.”
Arguments which, even if true, are not a basis for overturning a duly passed ordinance.
The Save the Plastic Bag Coalition was clearly wasting the court’s time.
Still, just to be sure the Davis law passes constitutional muster, I have scoured the Bill of Rights for any violation I might be able to take before a court of law.
The First Amendment offers some hope by saying Congress — or the Davis City Council — “shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble plastic bags.”
The Second Amendment states “The right of the people to keep and bear bags shall not be infringed” and the Fourth Amendment guarantees “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, paper bags, plastic bags and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
If you’re arrested for violating the plastic bag ordinance, the Sixth Amendment grants you the right to “enjoy” a speedy trial, the Eighth Amendment guarantees you the right to reasonable bail and also prevents the city of Davis from inflicting cruel and unusual punishment, like forcing a seagull to fly around the Yolo County Landfill with a Walmart bag on its head.
All in all, I’m afraid there’s not much there for the Save the Plastic Bag folks to hang their hats on.
Now, I may not like the plastic bag ordinance we passed here in Davis, but we all got to have our say before the council voted and the law is the law.
If you don’t like it, shop in Woodland.

— Reach Bob Dunning at bdunning@davisenterprise.net

LEAVE A COMMENT

Discussion | 4 comments

The Davis Enterprise does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy

  • January 08, 2014 - 6:42 am

    "If you don’t like it, shop in Woodland." That's how to get the law changed, if enough shop elsewhere you can bet the store owners will go screaming to the council.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • MLJanuary 08, 2014 - 10:37 am

    And how about this smoking ban, Mr. Dunning? I'm not a smoker, but find these laws becoming more and more Big Brotherish. In my college days, I knew what I was going to experience if I went to the colorful Coffee House ... newspapers everywhere, a good sandwich, and the smell of clove cigarettes. If the smell was too strong, we went outside. If we wanted an antiseptic lunch or 100-percent smoke free experience, we had plenty of options.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • willMarch 31, 2014 - 10:10 pm

    You left out the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act. Plastic bags are ADAPTIVE DEVICES. Try carrying pillows, and cookware sets without extra large plastic bags walking home without a driver's license due to a disability condition, and walk with a cane. CANNOT BE DONE. That's like the city banning stores from using braille or having an English only policy. Visually impaired people cook, and shop. An extra large plastic bag assists the Visually impaired community. Cities such as Davis should fear folks from the National Federal for the Blind. FOOD FOR THOUGHT.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • willMarch 31, 2014 - 10:12 pm

    Meant to say National Federation for the Blind. Typo in the previous post. Store cannot reasonably accommodate a person with a disability because the city ordinance banned stated accommodation now forced to shop in Woodland. That's ripe for a ADA lawsuit. Reminds me of Whites and Colored restrooms during Jim Crow.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
.

News

4-H members get ready for Spring Show

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A1 | Gallery

 
Will city move forward on public power review?

By Dave Ryan | From Page: A1

 
 
2 pursuits, 2 arrests keep Woodland officers busy

By Lauren Keene | From Page: A2

 
Obama to Russia: More sanctions are ‘teed up’

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2

 
 
Youth sports in focus on radio program

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

 
Rummage sale will benefit preschool

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Concert benefits South Korea exchange

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

 
Conference puts focus on Arab studies

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Central Park Gardens to host Volunteer Orientation Day

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5 | Gallery

 
Volkssporting Club plans North Davis walks

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

Hotel/conference center info meeting set

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

 
Davis honors ‘green’ citizens

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

Water rate assistance bill advances

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

 
Program explores STEM careers for girls

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5, 1 Comment

Embroiderers plan a hands-on project

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

 
MOMS Club plans open house

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A7

 
Cycle de Mayo benefits Center for Families

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A8

Author to read ‘The Cat Who Chose to Dream’

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A12

 
.

Forum

Things are turning sour

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: B5

 
Ortiz is the right choice for Yolo

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

Tom Meyer cartoon

By Debbie Davis | From Page: A6

 
The high cost of employment

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6, 1 Comment

High-five to Union Bank

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

 
Broken sprinklers waste water

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

Three more administrators?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

 
Neustadt has experience for the job

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

Here’s a plan to save big on employee costs

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A6, 3 Comments

 
Davis is fair, thoughtful

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A6

.

Sports

DHS boys shuffle the deck to beat Cards

By Thomas Oide | From Page: B1 | Gallery

 
DHS/Franklin II is a close loss for Devil softballers

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

DHS tracksters sweep another DVC meet

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1 | Gallery

 
Another DVC blowout for DHS girls soccer

By Evan Ream | From Page: B1, 2 Comments | Gallery

Young reinvents his game to help Aggies improve on the diamond

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1 | Gallery

 
Baseball roundup: Giants slam Rockies in the 11th

By The Associated Press | From Page: B2

 
UCD roundup: Aggies lose a softball game at Pacific

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B3

Jahn jumps to Sacramento Republic FC

By Evan Ream | From Page: B8

 
.

Features

.

Arts

 
Emerson, Da Vinci to present ‘Once Upon a Mattress’

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A11

Winters Plein Air Festival begins Friday

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A11

 
 
Bach Soloists wrap up season on April 28

By Jeff Hudson | From Page: A11

Congressional art competition open to high school students

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A11

 
.

Business

.

Obituaries

.

Comics

Comics: Thursday, April 24, 2014

By Creator | From Page: B6