Friday, July 25, 2014

Bob Dunning: When yes means no, and no means yes


From page A2 | May 14, 2014 |

Confusion reigns supreme in the Second Most Educated City in America.
My friend Carol writes to say “I am more confused than ever after reading articles for and against Measure P. It seems to me that if you vote ‘no’ you mean ‘yes’ and if you vote ‘yes’ you mean ‘no.’ Now I am really confused. I think you have to set us all straight on this one more time before the big vote.”
Add to that Otto’s opinion that “A lot of people are confused about Measure P. Here we have the case of 1) voting for something to vote against something; or 2) voting against something to vote for something.”
Owen, meanwhile, says he called the city to see how the CBFR would work for renters and was told “the rate would be based on what the previous tenant consumed, so if you are going to rent a home in Davis, you’d better ask about the previous tenant’s usage before signing that lease.”
Which brings us to Claudia, who, after attending forums and debates and reading arguments and rebuttals to arguments surrounding Measure P, is absolutely appalled “to find myself on the same side of this as people I never agree with, like Jose Granda and Ernie Head. So I thought I’d ask you if my head is indeed on straight.”
The Davis Enterprise, speaking editorially, weighed in on all this municipal dizziness by accurately stating that “Voters are worried about the rising cost of water, and they’re confused about the consumption-based fixed rate that will take effect in January.”
Actually, the CBFR has already taken effect. It formally began on May 1. It’s just that we won’t see the bills from the CBFR until next January. But trust me, your “summer” usage is being tallied by Big Brother even as we speak.
The Enterprise, while urging a “no” vote to keep the current rates in place, then argues that the “controversial” CBFR structure should be scrapped.
“We remain uncomfortable with basing part of a future year’s rates entirely on summer usage,” The Enterprise writes, reflecting the views of many citizens in this town.
Adding to the confusion is a highly respected water expert named Ned. Or is it Ted or maybe Jed? His first name has escaped me for the moment, so let’s just call him Fred.
Turns out Fred was so confident the CBFR is a great deal for Davis that he fired off a letter to the editor that was published online. In it, Jed used actual facts and figures from his own consumption to demonstrate that even for a large water consumer like himself (20 ccf per month in summer), his bill even in 2018 when rates are highest, will be only $7.41 higher than it was last summer. A remarkable claim indeed, but given his credentials, who would dare to argue with Ned?
Well, as fate would have it, Ted doesn’t understand the CBFR any better than anyone else and miscalculated his rates by a whopping $648 a year. In his favor, of course.
Somehow, Fred’s letter disappeared from cyberspace faster than you can say “screenshot,” never to be seen again. Whether he’s sticking to that $648 miscalculation will forever remain a mystery. At least until he gets his bill.
Then there was the major proponent of “Yes on P” who admitted to me that her Ph.D.-laden husband got up one recent morning with a confused look on his face and said “Tell me again, dear, which way we’re voting on Measure P.”
Adding even more to the confusion is the fact that a major metropolitan newspaper recently claimed Davisites already voted on the rates in March of 2013. Put simply, we didn’t.
And we haven’t even discussed those incredible lawn signs for Yes on P and No on P, the former claiming “Fair Rates for All” and the latter promising to “Keep Rates Fair.”
For the record, Measure P asks, “Shall an initiative ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2405, which adopted increased water rates, and putting water rates in effect prior to May 1, 2013, back into effect, be adopted?”
In other words, if you like the old rates, vote “yes.” And if you like the new rates, vote “no.”
There now, wasn’t that easy?

— Reach Bob Dunning at


Discussion | 5 comments

The Davis Enterprise does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy

  • Napoleon Pig IVMay 14, 2014 - 11:11 am

    A time-honored technique of maintaining the flow of power to the porcine pinnacle can be summarized as "Confusion to the sheep." So, to further clarify, all obedient and patriotic sheep who wish to delegate thinking to their clearly superior Dear Leaders must vote No on P. However, those out-of-control flock critters plagued by aspirations beyond their proper place on the farm will vote Yes on P. And, of course, those happy and oblivious grazers on the far side of the pasture who fervently believe in Power to the Pigs will not bother to vote at all.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Snowball (I can haz A on my English paper?)May 14, 2014 - 1:14 pm

    Thank goodness for dear Napoleon! Here he comes to tell us lowly animals how to avoid the propaganda! Don't bother your heads with math and figures, they are all just distractions from Napoleon's truth! Pay no heed to Matt Williams and his pesky figures, as well as his insistence that the Davis WAC were open about the rates and held public meetings which all could attend (but largely ignored). Trust your gut, for it has been said that it has more neurons than your brain (you know it's true, just look it up in your gut). Remember, Napoleon is always right!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • May 14, 2014 - 7:18 pm

    One thing's for sure, that "Napoleon" shtick will NEVER get old.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • CP BuilderMay 14, 2014 - 10:38 pm

    Certainly not as long as there are politicians feeding at the trough.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Alan MillerMay 14, 2014 - 12:20 pm

    "“the rate would be based on what the previous tenant consumed," if true, it is appalling that could be legal. I've been told by CBFR proponents there is a solution to this, but I'm not clear how that works or if it is written in stone or is just "possible". To repeat my earlier comment: The editorial proposes that CBFR be dumped, yet urges a no vote on Measure P. Without a threat to the City, what motivation does the City have to dump CBFR? I doubt an Enterprise editorial is enough. Tell you what, City and Paper, I will vote No on Measure P if the City dumps CBFR. I may not not be alone in that sentiment.

    Reply | Report abusive comment


Tech Trekkers boldly go into STEM fields

By Amy Jiang | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Decoding breast milk secrets reveals clues to lasting health

By Pat Bailey | From Page: A1 | Gallery

California climate change policies to hit our pocketbooks

By San Francisco Chronicle | From Page: A1

Carwash raises funds for funeral expenses

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A2

Appeals court upholds high-speed rail route

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2

Artists, photographers invited to support Yolo Basin Foundation

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A3 | Gallery

Unitarians will host summer camp

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

Sudwerk’s sales grow, floating on a sea of dry hop lager

By Elizabeth Case | From Page: A4 | Gallery

Wetlands visitors will see migrating shorebirds

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A6 | Gallery

‘Bak2Sac’ free train ride program launched

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A7

Explorit: Wonderful wetlands right at home

By Lisa Justice | From Page: A8 | Gallery

Recycle old paint cans for free

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A8

Where your gas money goes

By San Francisco Chronicle | From Page: A12

STEAC needs donations of personal care items

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A16, 1 Comment

Americans, internationals make connections

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A16

Can you give them a home?

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A16 | Gallery



Trio disagrees on best option

By Creators Syndicate | From Page: B5

Thanks for emergency help

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

Commenting system to change

By Debbie Davis | From Page: A10, 24 Comments

Support these local restaurants

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

Let’s get the bench repaired

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

Tom Meyer cartoon

By Debbie Davis | From Page: A10

Predicting climate changes

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10, 1 Comment

Clinton’s book is worth a read

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10, 2 Comments



Enriquez brilliant, but Post 77 season ends with Area 1 loss

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Hudson solid, Hamels better in Giants’ loss

By The Associated Press | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Petrovic, Putnam share Canadian Open lead

By The Associated Press | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Moss powers A’s past Astros

By The Associated Press | From Page: B1 | Gallery

The un-Armstrong? Tour ‘boss’ Nibali wins Stage 18

By The Associated Press | From Page: B8 | Gallery





‘A Most Wanted Man’: Superb espionage drama

By Derrick Bang | From Page: A9 | Gallery

Clyde Elmore: Art in the Wild

By Evan Arnold-Gordon | From Page: A9 | Gallery

Musicians perform at Sunday service

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A17 | Gallery



Accord’s latest model is most fuel efficient

By Ann M. Job | From Page: B3 | Gallery



Mary Lita Bowen

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4

James Thomas Feather

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4

Richard ‘Dick’ Robenalt

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A7



Comics: Friday, July 25, 2014

By Creator | From Page: A13


Real Estate Review

Featured Listing

By Zack Snow | From Page: RER1

Professional Services Directory

By Zack Snow | From Page: RER2


By Zack Snow | From Page: RER3

Tracy Harris

By Zack Snow | From Page: RER4

Vaughan Brookshaw

By Zack Snow | From Page: RER4

Sherman Home

By Zack Snow | From Page: RER4

Julie Leonard

By Zack Snow | From Page: RER5

Ciana Wallace

By Zack Snow | From Page: RER6

Melrina A Maggiora

By Zack Snow | From Page: RER7

Joe Kaplan

By Zack Snow | From Page: RER7

Jo Vallejo

By Zack Snow | From Page: RER8

Jamie Madison

By Zack Snow | From Page: RER9

Karen Waggoner

By Zack Snow | From Page: RER9