Sunday, January 25, 2015
YOLO COUNTY NEWS
99 CENTS

Court to decide free speech vs. accuracy

BobDunning2W

By
From page A2 | January 19, 2012 |

For a while there, it appeared that the nasty little dispute over ballot language on Measure C was going to be resolved with some sort of out-of-court compromise. At least that’s what Yolo County Superior Court Judge Samuel McAdam had hoped.

However, according to a news release emailed to me by Measure C opponents — both of them — there will be a showdown in Woodland come Friday afternoon.

Writes Jose Granda of the No on C group, “Authors of ballot arguments against Measure C will wrestle in court with County Clerk Freddie Oakley and her former boss and former County Clerk, Tony Bernhard.” (They actually misspelled “Bernhard,” but I’ve decided not to mention it in print.)

Now, I don’t know about you, but I’d pay good money to see Jose Granda and his tag-team partner, Tommy Randall, wrestle with Freddie Oakley and Tony Bernhard, no matter how you spell his last name. Mud wrestling, preferably. In a cage with barbed wire all the way to the ceiling.

Quoting further from the No on C news release,”Granda and Randall’s position is that they have spoken truthfully about the pitfalls of an all-vote-by-mail election and that the protection of the First Amendment and the California Constitution, Article I, Section 2, protects their freedom to criticize the substance of Measure C and the process under which it is being offered to the public.”

Specifically, Granda and Randall seem as upset with the method of voting (mail only) as they are with the schools tax itself, though make no mistake, these two would oppose Measure C even if we were all required to vote the old-fashioned way by actually showing up in person at the polls.

The news release brings up the case of “Huntington Beach City Council v. Superior Court,” where “the Court (Court of Appeal, Fourth District) noted that any restrictions on ballot language must be drawn narrowly because the First Amendment right to freedom of speech is implicated.”

In Huntington, the court took on relevancy of a ballot argument by noting that Elections Code section 9295 “does not mention relevancy as among the limited bases on which a trial court has authority to strike a statement.” The court further stated “Courts must be extremely reticent in undertaking the essentially political task of playing copy editor with one side’s working of a voters’ pamphlet argument. In the political arena, after all, one person’s relevant argument is another person’s nonsense.”

Indeed.

In the case at hand, however, the charge against Granda and Randall is that their ballot statement — “This all vote-by-mail election is an undemocratic, process which significantly reduces oversight to maintain the integrity of an election” — is in itself false and misleading.

The court in Huntington notes that “Official voters’ pamphlets are limited public forums provided by the government, so the government can constitutionally impose what would be an otherwise unlawful prior restraint of speech by way of precluding false or misleading statements.”

As precedent for this, the court cites “San Francisco Forty-Niners v. Nishioka.” I am not making this up. Why the court didn’t cite “San Francisco Forty-Niners v. Eli Manning” is unclear.

The court reasons that “because freedom of speech is implicated, any restrictions must be narrowly drawn. The statute at issue here expressly requires clear and convincing evidence before the trial court may interfere with a ballot argument, and the Legislature went out of its way to emphasize the narrowness of the scope of any proper challenges by appending the word ‘only’ in front of the heightened evidentiary standard.

“The operative language in section 9295,” the court goes on, “is ‘A peremptory writ of mandate or an injunction shall be issued only upon clear and convincing proof that the material in question is false, misleading, or inconsistent with the requirements of this chapter.’ ” (Chapter 3 of the Elections Code).

In other words, while freedom of speech is partially at issue here, the authors of a ballot argument do not enjoy the exact same freedoms in that regard as they would if making their arguments on a street corner.

The No on C folks have submitted a ballot argument that states: “This all vote-by-mail election is an undemocratic process which significantly reduces oversight to maintain the integrity of an election. It eliminates poll workers, observers, secret ballots, counting with public presence at the polls. Opening and counting ballots days before the polls close is a questionable process.”

If those words can be shown, with clear and convincing proof, to be “false, misleading or inconsistent,” they should, under the law, be struck.

But if Granda and Randall can demonstrate that their charges are at least an open question, their argument should remain.

That is the only question to be decided at Friday’s hearing. Which way the respective combatants may lean on the merits of Measure C itself is simply not relevant to the case at hand.

— Reach Bob Dunning at bdunning@davisenterprise.net

Comments

comments

.

News

Bridges of Yolo County: Wear, tear … repair?

By Elizabeth Case | From Page: A1 | Gallery

 
Four days of unusual, adventuresome music

By Jeff Hudson | From Page: A1 | Gallery

 
Spanish police arrest 4 suspected members of a jihadi cell

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2

Rockets kill 30 in Ukrainian city as rebels launch offensive

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2

 
Abe ‘speechless’ after video claims IS hostage dead

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2

GOP presses state bills limiting gay rights before ruling

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2

 
Abortion opponents express renewed hope at California rally

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2

Share your love (story) with us

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

 
Sip wines at St. James’ annual tasting

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A3

Fake schools draw federal scrutiny

By The Associated Press | From Page: A3 | Gallery

 
Winter produce available at Sutter market

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A3

Vote for your favorites in Readers’ Choice poll

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

 
Donations to be distributed during homeless count

By Anne Ternus-Bellamy | From Page: A4

 
Speaker will share computer security tips

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Logos Books celebrates 5 years, offers language groups

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

 
Australian olive oil company opens U.S. headquarters in Woodland

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4

Explore at the YOLO Outdoor Expo

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

 
Pedal around Davis on weekly bike ride

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

 
Yolo animal shelter seeking rawhide donations

By Lauren Keene | From Page: A5

Woodland Healthcare employees take Great Kindness Challenge

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A5

 
At the Pond: Nest boxes give birds new homes

By Jean Jackman | From Page: A6 | Gallery

California ranks worst in nation for guidance counselors

By The Associated Press | From Page: A7

 
Davis, Woodland are saving water

By Elizabeth Case | From Page: A12

Words and Music Festival events

By Jeff Hudson | From Page: A12

 
.

Forum

Family isn’t keen on relationship

By Creators Syndicate | From Page: A8

 
 
Caring for the aging mouth

By Samer Alassaad | From Page: A8

Big utilities’ nightmare begins to play out

By Tom Elias | From Page: A10

 
Mayor’s Corner: Let’s renew Davis together

By Dan Wolk | From Page: A10

We have the right to choose

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

 
We don’t have to suffer

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

City helped immensely

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

 
Rick McKee cartoon

By Debbie Davis | From Page: A10

When measles spreads from Disneyland, it’s a small world after all

By New York Times News Service | From Page: A11

 
From innovation parks to innovative buildings and planning

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A11

.

Sports

Wildcats’ inaugural kids development league exceeds expectations

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1 | Gallery

 
Aggies get top 2015 gymnastics score, but fall short

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Loud crowd sees DHS boys win

By Spencer Ault | From Page: B1 | Gallery

 
Lady Devils hold off Pacers, stay perfect in league

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

UCD men take two tennis matches

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B8

 
Watney in ninth at Humana Challenge

By Staff and wire reports | From Page: B8

.

Features

.

Arts

.

Business

Davis man focusing on cannabidiol business

By Will Bellamy | From Page: A9

 
Marrone Bio’s Regalia approved for new uses in Canada

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A9

 
UCD grad makes insurance ‘hot 100′ list

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A9

Yolo County real estate sales

By Zoe Juanitas | From Page: A9

 
.

Obituaries

.

Comics

Comics: Sunday, January 25, 2015

By Creator | From Page: B8