Friday, August 29, 2014

State Supreme Court decision in Alameda school parcel tax case could impact Davis district

From page A1 | June 14, 2013 |

A decision this week by the California Supreme Court regarding a parcel tax in the Alameda Unified School District could have big implications for the Davis school district as well.

In a unanimous decision, the court let stand a lower court ruling that struck down several aspects of the district’s Measure H, a school parcel tax approved by voters there in 2008.

Measure H was challenged by a local businessman, and several others, who objected to the different rates charged homeowners and commercial property owners. The lawsuits — Borikas et al v. Alameda Unified School District — contended that state law requires “uniformity” in a parcel tax, i.e., a tax that will “apply uniformly to all taxpayers or all real property within the district.”

In Davis, local voters approved the school parcel tax Measure E last Nov. 6. It also charges different rates — $204 per year for single-family homes and $20 per unit per year for apartments, duplexes and other multi-unit dwellings.

Measure E was challenged in federal court and in Yolo Superior Court by several local tax activists. The federal lawsuit was consolidated into the Yolo Superior Court challenge in April, with the next hearing there set for July 29.

Plaintiff Jose Granda, a vocal opponent of several recent school parcel tax measures, was pleased with the decision, and predicted that the local court will “determine (that) Measure E is also invalid, as Measure E has the identical legal defects as did the (Alameda Unified) parcel tax.”

“I told the school board that Measure E was illegal,” Granda said. “Instead of structuring a tax that was not subject to legal attack, they needlessly took a significant risk.”

At a June 2012 school board meeting at which Measure E’s ballot language was drafted, attorney Peter Sturges, who advises the Davis school board on parcel tax matters, told the trustees that the dual-rate tax outlined in Measure E would be permissible under state law.

On March 6, the California Court of Appeal’s First Appellate District struck down portions of Alameda’s Measure H,  saying “(the) imposition of a higher tax on commercial or industrial property … exceeds the (Alameda) district’s taxing authority,” but adding “the language in Measure H imposing a different and higher tax rate on non-residential property… is easily excised, and its absence leaves a coherent, functioning tax measure.”

The appellate court decision also validated parcel tax exemptions for senior citizens and disabled people who are homeowners.

Alameda Unified quickly took the case to the California Supreme Court, seeking to have the decision reviewed. Now that the high court has declined to do so, Borikas will now return to the trial court, which will consider possible remedies. These potentially include refunds of some tax payments collected between 2008 and 2011, when the measure expired.

“We are disappointed the California Supreme Court declined to review this case,” said Kirsten Vital, superintendent of Alameda Unified, who added that there could be “a significant blow to our budget with many negative consequences for students, teachers and staff here in Alameda, as well as for other districts and local agencies across the state.

“We are also continuing to work with our elected representatives in the Legislature to clarify the legal standards applicable to parcel taxes.”

(In January, Assemblyman Rob Bonta, D-Alameda, introduced AB 59, a bill that would permit school districts to “assess taxes in accordance with rational classifications among taxpayers or types of property within the school district.” But Bonta’s bill hasn’t gotten past the committee level.)

Winfred Roberson, superintendent of the Davis school district, said the Supreme Court’s decision “impacts the pending legal challenge to Measure E. However, we are also aware that a possible legislative solution may bring a favorable resolution to this matter.

“Meanwhile, the Davis school district will do all within its power to defend the overwhelming decision of the Davis community to support their local schools through Measure E.”

Davis school board president Sheila Allen said “the school board and the Davis school district’s voters acted with their best intentions and current understanding of state law to support their local public schools” when approving Measure E.

“We remain committed to assuring that the will of the voters is implemented according to current law and court decisions,” Allen said.

— Reach Jeff Hudson at or 530-747-8055.





Saving Putah Creek: a quiet concert at sunset

By Elizabeth Case | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Mr. Dolcini goes to Washington

By Tanya Perez | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Winton to be feted for her many years of community work

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Davis Innovation Center team fields questions

By Dave Ryan | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Researchers solve mystery of Death Valley’s moving rocks

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2 | Gallery

California extends review of $25B delta plan

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2

Assembly approves statewide ban on plastic bags

By The Associated Press | From Page: A2

Need a new best friend?

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3 | Gallery

Equestrian eventing competition slated

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

Dinner, auction benefit Yolo County CASA

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

Forum explores local mental health services

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

Solar-cooking workshop set at Food Co-op

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

Celebrate the Senior Center at Sept. 9 luncheon

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

Kids can sign up for a library card and get a free book

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4

Explorit Science Center: Volunteers supercharge summer camp

By Lisa Justice | From Page: A4 | Gallery

Tee off for Davis’ continued prosperity

By Lily Holmes | From Page: A4

Bodega Marine Laboratory hosts open house

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A5 | Gallery

Local group charts a year’s worth of beauty in flowers

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

Free blood pressure screenings offered

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

Name Droppers: UCD honors two of its own

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A6

Books, conversation and poetry at Logos

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A7



Let’s sell the MRAP on eBay

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: C2

Seeing both sides of ‘tank’

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: C2

What if we need MRAP?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: C2

How could tank be helpful?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: C2

Tom Meyer cartoon

By Debbie Davis | From Page: C2

Don’t sentence our police to death

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: C2, 1 Comment

Will Davis see river water?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: C2

Travel buddy is getting too fat

By Creators Syndicate | From Page: B5



Returning seniors, new faces lead promising DHS links squad

By Evan Ream | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Devil golfers return from Scotland with smiles on their faces

By Evan Ream | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Devils scrimmage with Sac

By Wayne Tilcock | From Page: B1 | Gallery

UCD-Stanford: the clock is down to counting the minutes

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1

Forget the score; focus on the energy brought by Aggies

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1

Wire briefs: Aces cruise past Cats at Raley

By Wire and staff reports | From Page: B6

Sports briefs: DHS girls fall by the slimmest of net margins

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B6 | Gallery





‘The November Man’: Who can be trusted?

By Derrick Bang | From Page: A9 | Gallery

B Street’s ‘The Ladies Foursome’ is aces

By Bev Sykes | From Page: A9 | Gallery



Technology makes a great car better

By Ali Arsham | From Page: C1 | Gallery



Margarita Elizondo

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4

Elaine Dracia Greenberg

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4