<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UCD rally ties tuition fight to Occupy movement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/ucd/rally-ties-tuition-fight-to-occupy-movement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/ucd/rally-ties-tuition-fight-to-occupy-movement/</link>
	<description>Yolo County, California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 06:05:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bossrove.opentopictest.org &#124; The Death of the Golden Dream of Education &#124; The Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/ucd/rally-ties-tuition-fight-to-occupy-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-328216</link>
		<dc:creator>bossrove.opentopictest.org &#124; The Death of the Golden Dream of Education &#124; The Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 16:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davisenterprise.com/?p=105099#comment-328216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A rallying cry for the dozen or so students who occupied that path was the price of an education. In just eight years, tuition at UC-Davis had more than doubled. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A rallying cry for the dozen or so students who occupied that path was the price of an education. In just eight years, tuition at UC-Davis had more than doubled. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan Moravec</title>
		<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/ucd/rally-ties-tuition-fight-to-occupy-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-63307</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan Moravec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davisenterprise.com/?p=105099#comment-63307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How come it costs 50% more (after adjusting for inflation) for University of California Board of Regents Chair Lansing and President Yudof to provide the same service?

Total expenditures in the UC system in 1999-2000 were $3.2 billion to educate a student population of 154,000. Converted into 2011 dollars using the Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI calculator gets us to $4.3B in 2011 dollars, which comes out to $27,850 per student.

In 2011, the total UC system budget was $6.3 billion dollars: an increase of almost 50% after adjusting for inflation. Enrollment also rose - to 158,000 students, a 3% increase, yielding a cost per student of $39,750.

Costs went up 50% in 10 years.  And yet the news out of UC President Yudof is that the UC system is &quot;bracing&quot; for &#039;another round of budget cuts&#039;!

Email opinions to UC Board of Regents   marsha.kelman@ucop.edu]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come it costs 50% more (after adjusting for inflation) for University of California Board of Regents Chair Lansing and President Yudof to provide the same service?</p>
<p>Total expenditures in the UC system in 1999-2000 were $3.2 billion to educate a student population of 154,000. Converted into 2011 dollars using the Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI calculator gets us to $4.3B in 2011 dollars, which comes out to $27,850 per student.</p>
<p>In 2011, the total UC system budget was $6.3 billion dollars: an increase of almost 50% after adjusting for inflation. Enrollment also rose &#8211; to 158,000 students, a 3% increase, yielding a cost per student of $39,750.</p>
<p>Costs went up 50% in 10 years.  And yet the news out of UC President Yudof is that the UC system is &#8220;bracing&#8221; for &#8216;another round of budget cuts&#8217;!</p>
<p>Email opinions to UC Board of Regents   <a href="mailto:marsha.kelman@ucop.edu">marsha.kelman@ucop.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan Moravec</title>
		<link>http://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/ucd/rally-ties-tuition-fight-to-occupy-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-61664</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan Moravec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davisenterprise.com/?p=105099#comment-61664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[University of California Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau hijack’s our kids’ futures. I love University of California (UC) having been a student &amp; lecturer. But today I am concerned that at times I do not recognize the UC I love. Like so many I am deeply disappointed by the pervasive failures of Regent Chairwoman Lansing, President Yudof, Chancellor Birgeneau from holding the line on rising costs &amp; tuition increases. Paying more is not a better education.
Californians are reeling from 19% unemployment (includes: those forced to work part time; those no longer searching), mortgage defaults, loss of unemployment benefits. And those who still have jobs are working longer for less. Faculty wages must reflect California&#039;s ability to pay, not what others are paid. 
Current pay increases for generously paid University of California Faculty is arrogance. Instate tuition consumes 14% of Ca. Median Family Income! 
Paying more is not a better education. UC Berkeley(# 70 Forbes) tuition increases exceed the national average rate of increases. Chancellor Birgeneau has molded Cal. into the most expensive public university.
UC President Yudof, Cal. Chancellor Birgeneau($450,000 salary) dismissed many much needed cost-cutting options. They did not consider freezing vacant faculty positions, increasing class size, requiring faculty to teach more classes, doubling the time between sabbaticals, cutting &amp; freezing pay &amp; benefits for chancellors &amp; reforming pensions &amp; the health benefits.
They said such faculty reforms “would not be healthy for UC”. Exodus of faculty, administrators? Who can afford them and where would they go?
We agree it is far from the ideal situation, but it is in the best interests of the university system &amp; the state to stop cost increases. UC cannot expect to do business as usual: raising tuition; granting pay raises &amp; huge bonuses during a weak economy that has sapped state revenues &amp; individual Californians’ income.
There is no question the necessary realignments with economic reality are painful. Regent Chairwoman Lansing can bridge the public trust gap with reassurances that salaries &amp; costs reflect California’s ability to pay. The sky above UC will not fall when Chancellor Birgeneau is ousted.

Opinions? Email the UC Board of Regents  marsha.kelman@ucop.edu]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>University of California Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau hijack’s our kids’ futures. I love University of California (UC) having been a student &amp; lecturer. But today I am concerned that at times I do not recognize the UC I love. Like so many I am deeply disappointed by the pervasive failures of Regent Chairwoman Lansing, President Yudof, Chancellor Birgeneau from holding the line on rising costs &amp; tuition increases. Paying more is not a better education.<br />
Californians are reeling from 19% unemployment (includes: those forced to work part time; those no longer searching), mortgage defaults, loss of unemployment benefits. And those who still have jobs are working longer for less. Faculty wages must reflect California&#8217;s ability to pay, not what others are paid.<br />
Current pay increases for generously paid University of California Faculty is arrogance. Instate tuition consumes 14% of Ca. Median Family Income!<br />
Paying more is not a better education. UC Berkeley(# 70 Forbes) tuition increases exceed the national average rate of increases. Chancellor Birgeneau has molded Cal. into the most expensive public university.<br />
UC President Yudof, Cal. Chancellor Birgeneau($450,000 salary) dismissed many much needed cost-cutting options. They did not consider freezing vacant faculty positions, increasing class size, requiring faculty to teach more classes, doubling the time between sabbaticals, cutting &amp; freezing pay &amp; benefits for chancellors &amp; reforming pensions &amp; the health benefits.<br />
They said such faculty reforms “would not be healthy for UC”. Exodus of faculty, administrators? Who can afford them and where would they go?<br />
We agree it is far from the ideal situation, but it is in the best interests of the university system &amp; the state to stop cost increases. UC cannot expect to do business as usual: raising tuition; granting pay raises &amp; huge bonuses during a weak economy that has sapped state revenues &amp; individual Californians’ income.<br />
There is no question the necessary realignments with economic reality are painful. Regent Chairwoman Lansing can bridge the public trust gap with reassurances that salaries &amp; costs reflect California’s ability to pay. The sky above UC will not fall when Chancellor Birgeneau is ousted.</p>
<p>Opinions? Email the UC Board of Regents  <a href="mailto:marsha.kelman@ucop.edu">marsha.kelman@ucop.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/ucd/rally-ties-tuition-fight-to-occupy-movement/feed/ ) in 0.28112 seconds, on May 25th, 2013 at 12:36 am PDT. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 25th, 2013 at 1:36 am PDT -->