Friday, October 24, 2014

UCD chancellor is coming up for five-year review

From page A1 | August 01, 2014 |

Katehi fullW

UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi, photographed in the reading room at Shields Library, came to campus five years ago, in August 2009. Courtesy photo

Similar to an employee evaluation, UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi will be receiving her five-year review in the upcoming academic year.

What this means is not what many people believe; Katehi is not up for contract renewal.

“I want to be very clear that this is not the case,” said Nina Robinson, chief policy adviser at the University of California Office of the President. “That’s not how the university operates. Chancellors are hired and serve at the will of the president and Board of Regents. They are evaluated in an ongoing fashion. There’s not any kind of moment at which they have to be reconfirmed.”

The review itself will be done by a committee of five faculty members — three from UCD and two from other UC campuses. The campus academic senates are responsible for choosing these committee members.

Once formed, the committee members solicit information from the entire faculty, then they write a confidential report that summarizes that information. From there, a report is provided to the UC president, Janet Napolitano, to use as input in her evaluation process. This will be the first time that Napolitano, who took office last September, is conducting a chancellor review.

The Academic Senate at UCD — as well as at all of the UC campuses — has a process it uses for nominating faculty for committee assignments, Robinson explained.

Typically, she said, campuses solicit expressions of interest — usually letters are sent to the entire faculty asking for participation in senate activities — for various committees that will need members in a given year. A “committee on committees” is then responsible for appointing three members to the chancellor’s review team.

A similar process takes place at the systemwide level, where a committee on committees identifies two other UC faculty from outside of UCD.

The review committee begins its information-gathering by way of letters solicited from all members of the Academic Senate.

“The letters themselves are not part of the package that the chancellor and president sees,” Robinson said.

Rather, a summary of the feedback is written up in a report for submission to, in this case, Katehi and Napolitano.

The review committee will exercise judgment if it believes a particular opinion in one letter is inconsistent with the vast majority of other input, Robinson said: “They are responsible for summarizing.”

This summary would note the strengths of the chancellor, the areas where “there’s a lot of agreement that this chancellor has really moved her the campus forward … (but also) there are some other areas where the faculty has expressed concern,” Robinson said.

The content of the report is then discussed between the chancellor and the president. Robinson pointed out that this report is merely one source of information for a president. Napolitano will use it to supplement her judgment, observations and knowledge of the chancellor.

“The president is constantly working with campus chancellors to help them be as effective and successful as they can,” Robinson said. “This is one piece of input that is officially solicited every five years, but it’s just one piece of input.”

Robinson also said there’s not a direct follow-up mechanism regarding the Academic Senate’s findings, but the president typically meets with representatives of the senate to discuss their report.

“And, for example, the president might say, ‘I agree with you on these five points, I don’t agree on point six,’ ” Robinson said.

But because a chancellor is always under review, the areas where concerns might have been expressed are not examined in the next five-year review. In fact, Robinson said, when “the next five-year review rolls around, the people who are doing the five-year review five years from now don’t have access to previous report. Each five years stands on its own.”

Do positive reviews and feedback translate to more money or other perks for a chancellor?

“At the university, we have not given increases in salary to chancellors in a very long time. They’re getting a 3 percent increase across the board this year. Unfortunately, we’re not in a position where we can reward them for excellent performance,” Robinson explained.

She summed up Katehi’s upcoming review as follows: “This is just one piece of feedback. … The process of chancellorial evaluation is ongoing.

“I’ve experienced in my time at UC that some people have a belief that chancellors are appointed for five years, and then they have to be reappointed every five years. That is absolutely not the case,” Robinson said.

Instead, she explained, “From the moment that they come on, they are actively being evaluated, coached, supported by the president. This is sort of like a taking of the temperature every five years, from the faculty, which is a hugely important constituent for every chancellor.

“But it’s not a definitive vote up or down for the chancellor,” Robinson said.

Notes: Robinson noted that chancellors and UC presidents are allowed to read the individual letters submitted as part of the chancellor’s evaluation process, with identifying factors redacted. As former UC President Mark Yudof’s chief of staff for 2 1/2 years, Robinson was on board during many chancellor reviews, but she never saw a chancellor “request copies of the letters. I think that in most cases, the letters are seen only by the committee members.”

— Reach Tanya Perez at 530-747-8056 or Follow her on Twitter at @enterprisetanya





Courageous Thompson tapped for cycling shrine

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: A1 | Gallery

A-Z: Downtown Davis is the place to celebrate

By Kimberly Yarris | From Page: C1

UC researchers: How low-water can our landscapes go?

By Katie F. Hetrick | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Can you give them a home?

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3 | Gallery

Scientists work to save endangered desert mammal

By Kat Kerlin | From Page: A3 | Gallery

Host families needed for students and teachers from Mexico

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A3

Halloween Dance set Friday for teens

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

Yoga and chanting workshop planned

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A3

Downtown menu: coffee, boba tea, dessert

By Wendy Weitzel | From Page: C3

Day of the Dead folk art class set

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Flea Market planned Sunday

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Red-hot tunes set at Blues Harvest

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Learn how to fill a cornucopia with flowers

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Enjoy A Taste of Capay at historic ranch

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

‘Homeopathy at Home’ program planned

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Meet Poppenga at dog park Sunday

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Video highlights Props. 1 and 2

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4

Celebrate origami at Davis library

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A4

Garden sale and open house features water-wise demos

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: C4

Bay Bridge art project needs $4 million to keep shining

By San Francisco Chronicle | From Page: A5 | Gallery

Weir honored, a year early

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A5

Explorit: Poison-proof your home with free lecture

By Lisa Justice | From Page: A6

For a good cause

By Fred Gladdis | From Page: A6

Americans, internationals make connections

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A6

Sutter auxiliary seeks volunteers

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A7

School board hopefuls discuss homework policy

By Jeff Hudson | From Page: A7

Project Linus seeks donations

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A9

Walkers welcome to join Sierra Club outings

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A9



A solution to the drought

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

Experience nature’s treasures

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

Subs have other concerns

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

Tom Meyer cartoon

By Debbie Davis | From Page: A10

What’s next with Ebola?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

More theories on the abstention

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

Rights beget responsibilities

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10

Water returns to its source

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A10



Aggies expect a bonny meeting in Sacramento

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1

DHS footballers take on Pleasant Grove

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B1

Bye No. 2 comes at perfect time for nicked up UCD

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Shhh. Are Aggie women BWC’s best-kept secret?

By Bruce Gallaudet | From Page: B1

Bump, set, playoffs: Blue Devil girls clinch spot in postseason

By Thomas Oide | From Page: B1 | Gallery

UCD roundup: Preseason awards roll in for Aggie hoopster Hawkins

By Enterprise staff | From Page: B2 | Gallery

Sharks suffer from road woes

By The Associated Press | From Page: B12





Rumpledethumps to play at Village Homes Performers’ Circle

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A11 | Gallery

DMTC plans ‘My Fair Lady’

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A11

Czech Philharmonic Orchestra to perform

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A11

Calling all artists for upcoming show

By Enterprise staff | From Page: A11





Ann Foley Scheuring

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4

Lewis Melvin Dudman

By Special to The Enterprise | From Page: A4



Comics: Friday, October 24, 2014

By Creator | From Page: B3